High School English Language Arts Teachers’ Argumentative Epistemologies for Teaching Writing
Abstract
Although current research and professional development on teaching of argumentative writing focus on “best practices,” we offer the construct of argumentative epistemologies to consider how English language arts teachers approach teaching and how they understand their students’ capacity for and interest in argumentation. Drawing on historical emphases in writing theory, we describe and illustrate three argumentative epistemologies: structural, ideational, and social practice. In an observational study of 31 high school English language arts classrooms, teachers’ enacted writing instruction foregrounded either formal elements of students’ arguments, the ideas and content of students’ arguments, or consideration of the complexity and variability of social contexts within which students wrote arguments. Case study analysis of three teachers illustrates the three argumentative epistemologies, how these epistemologies were socially constructed during instructional conversations, and how they were made visible through language use in and about classroom literacy events. These argumentative epistemologies have significance for teacher education, school writing research, and professional development, furthering our understanding of how and why teachers choose to adopt particular approaches to argumentative writing.
- Journal
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 2014-11-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/rte201426159
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (2)
-
Jacobson (2024)Written Communication
-
Williamson (2023)Research in the Teaching of English
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2018Josephine Walwema
-
Double Helix Jan 2018Potential Impacts of an Academic Writing and Publishing Module on Scholarship and Teaching: A Qualitative Study ↗Roisin Catherine-Anne Donnelly
-
College Composition and Communication Sep 2025Using the AI Life Cycle to Unblackbox AI Tools: Teaching Résumé 2.0 with Résumé Analytics and Computational Job-Résumé Matching ↗Huiling Ding
-
The Peer Review Sep 2025Ana Raquel Fialho Ferreira Campos; João Tiago Gaspar Cozechen; Elaine Pereira Lustosa; Marcos Angel De Carvalho Eing; Leonardo Schimiloski
-
Pedagogy Jan 2024Jessica Mastersonmodern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing