A Proposal for Practical (but Good) Research on Reading
Abstract
sources over the past several years (Templeton, 1969) . Literacy is no longer a luxury in this country; it is a necessity. Every child deserves a chance to become a skilled, competent reader. Our knowledge of the nature of the reading process and the acquisition of reading has increased noticeably over the past ten to twenty years, largely as a result of government funding of basic research on reading (Levin & Williams, 1970; Kling, 1971; Kavanaugh & Mattingly, 1972). To be sure, no adequate review of this progress is currently available, and the impact of these research findings on classroom practice has been minimal. As recently as this year (1974), a review of the psychology of reading introduces the area of research on reading acquisition: Despite all the current emphasis on literacy, the wealth of 'programs' commercially available, the 'learning specialists' who have set up in shopping centers and the arguments over phonics or whole word methods, it is the beginning phase of learning to read that we seem to know least about. All the talk is of what the teacher does or should do and not of what happens or should happen in the child. This is a very peculiar situation. There is presumably a learning process going on, but it is a rare psychologist who studies it. (Gibson Zc Levin, 1975, p. 264) Large amounts of money continue to be poured into the development and evaluation of competing reading curricula, with outcomes that are disappointing to say the least (Bond & Dykstra, 1967; Corder, 1971) . With few exceptions, these evaluation projects have fallen far short of minimum standards of experimental research in the behavioral sciences (Corder, 1971) . There is little one can learn from bad data. It is not surprising to find, on reanalysis, that the major outcome of the large First Grade Cooperative Reading study was the discovery that children of high IQ were more successful in learning to read than children of low IQ (Lohnes & Gray, 1972) . There have been at least three recent major efforts to synthesize the research
- Journal
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 1976-01-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/rte197620044
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Pedagogy Apr 2024modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
-
Pedagogy Oct 2023rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum two-year college teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing centers qualitative research multimodality literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
-
Pedagogy Apr 2022rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy creative writing writing across the curriculum teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing program administration technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric literacy studies gender and writing disability studies literary studies book reviews editorial matter
-
Journal of Response to Writing Jan 2021Review of <i>Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts</i> (1st edition), by Icy Lee, 2017 ↗Candee, LeNora
-
Assessing Writing Jan 2026Generative artificial intelligence for automated essay scoring: Exploring teacher agency through an ecological perspective ↗Jessie S. Barrot