Abstract

This article assesses the data practices of Grammarly, the prominent AI-assisted writing technology, by applying data principles that advocate for empowering Indigenous data sovereignty. The assessment is informed by the authors’ work with an Inuit tribal organization from rural Arctic Alaska that generated data and metadata about potentially sacred tribal activities. Their analysis of Grammarly's large-language modeling practices demonstrates how technical communication can hold businesses to principled data practices created by Indigenous nations and communities that understand how to create more just futures.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519241280587
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/20539517211017308
  2. 10.1145/1753326.1753689
  3. 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309
  4. 10.7551/mitpress/14050.001.0001
  5. 10.1145/2818048.2819931
  6. 10.1145/3592367.3592369
  7. 10.1177/2332649220949473
  8. 10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001
  9. 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →