Is Bad News Difficult to Read? A Readability Analysis of Differently Connoted Passages in the Annual Reports of the 30 DAX Companies

Claudia Thoms University of Hohenheim ; Anke Degenhart University of Hohenheim ; Katharina Wohlgemuth University of Hohenheim

Abstract

This study examines the strategic use of readability to obfuscate negative news in a German financial communication context. Combining a manual and an automated content analysis, the authors assess the tone and readability of three parts (chairman’s address, share-price development, and development in the fiscal year) of the 2014 annual reports of the 30 companies listed in the German stock index DAX. The results indicate that positively connoted passages in annual reports are not necessarily easier to read than negatively connoted passages. Furthermore, the readability of the annual report varies depending on the part and its function within the report.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651919892312
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 54 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00014788.1979.9729157
  2. 10.1177/1088868309341564
  3. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  4. 10.1108/02686901211189853
  5. 10.1111/auar.12053
  6. 10.1111/1475-6765.12235
  7. 10.2308/acch.2002.16.3.233
  8. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450
  9. 10.1007/978-3-322-81306-0_2
  10. 10.1086/261651
  11. 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00630.x
  12. 10.1108/09513570110399890
  13. 10.1016/0378-2166(87)90196-2
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-629X.1982.tb00036.x
  15. 10.1108/09513579510086795
  16. 10.1108/09513579810231457
  17. 10.1016/j.bar.2004.03.005
  18. 10.1177/002194360203900401
  19. 10.1108/13632540610646337
  20. 10.2307/256324
  21. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x
  22. 10.1080/19312450709336664
  23. 10.1177/0021943608319388
  24. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205
  25. Wertschöpfung durch Medien im Wandel
  26. 10.1108/13563281211253557
  27. 10.1109/TPC.2014.2311872
  28. 10.1007/978-3-531-92336-9_6
  29. 10.1007/978-3-658-00191-9
  30. 10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
  31. 10.1177/0093650213510940
  32. 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.08.003
  33. 10.1016/j.scoms.2013.09.002
  34. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
  35. 10.1007/978-3-8349-8810-2_28
  36. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.011
  37. 10.1080/00014788.2011.574222
  38. 10.2308/accr.00000001
  39. 10.1007/978-3-8349-8810-2_1
  40. 10.1007/978-3-8349-8810-2_19
  41. 10.1145/344599.344637
  42. 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00460.x
  43. 10.1023/A:1023647615279
  44. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.014
  45. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01526.x
  46. 10.1007/978-3-531-19621-3_3
  47. 10.1080/15531180802606596
  48. 10.1108/09513570210440568
  49. 10.1177/002194369202900404
  50. IFRS: Lagebericht und Konzernlagebericht: Grundlagen und Darstellung
  51. 10.1177/002194369303000103
  52. 10.1108/09513579910283503
  53. 10.1111/1475-679X.12039
  54. 10.1108/JCOM-11-2014-0066
CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network →