Mythmaking in Annual Reports

Carol David Iowa State University

Abstract

Annual reports produced today increasingly include elaborate photographs and graphics in the narrative section. Financial analysts and many scholars have judged these reports on their clarity, accuracy, and honesty. Because the narrative invites interpretations, such criteria are not sufficient, and additional standards need to be constructed. A semiological analysis of the textual and visual elements allows for the discovery of the techniques used by document designers to promote their companies’ values. Artistic images may encourage positive readings of annual reports, which, combined with similar messages in other media and repeated over time, invoke cultural myths. By definition, myths are broadly accepted commonplaces that conceal details of their subject, and communicators must expose the missing details and judge the myths within a specific context. This kind of analysis, acknowledging the constraints of the rhetorical situation of a single report, can identify effective criteria for judging the narrative's ethics.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2001-04-01
DOI
10.1177/105065190101500203
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/002194369202900201
  2. 10.2307/357383
  3. 10.1080/00014788.1986.9729329
  4. 10.1016/B978-0-12-223260-2.50011-6
  5. 10.1177/002194360003700101
  6. 10.1177/002194369403100305
  7. 10.1080/00014788.1988.9729377
  8. 10.1037/h0044352
  9. 10.1080/00014788.1982.9728820
  10. 10.1177/002194368702400303
  11. 10.1177/002194369303000103
  12. 10.1177/002194369803500106
  13. 10.1007/978-1-349-19355-4
  14. 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90017-1
CrossRef global citation count: 65 View in citation network →