Personal Communication Ties and Organizational Collaborations in Networks of Science, Education, and Business

Nikita Basov ; Vera Minina St Petersburg University

Abstract

The literature suggests that the success of innovation clusters is based on personal networks that connect members of scientific, educational, and business organizations, stimulating more formalized cross-boundary collaborations between the three sectors. But it is still unclear if such organizational collaborations actually correspond with these personal ties and which aspects of personal communication are most strongly associated with organizational collaborations. To investigate these issues, the authors applied network analysis to study an innovation cluster in Algarve, Portugal. They found that cross-boundary organizational collaborations corresponded with personal ties. Moreover, they found that collaborations appeared to correlate most strongly with emotional attachments between individuals.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651918762027
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 56 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.10.010
  2. 10.1006/juec.1997.2032
  3. 10.1080/1043859092000234311
  4. 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.018
  5. 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1992.tb00179.x
  6. 10.1108/S0733-558X20170000053005
  7. Basov N. (2018). Socio-Material Network Analysis: A Mixed Method Study of Five European Artistic Collectives.…
  8. 10.4324/9780203837122
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x
  10. 10.2307/20159624
  11. 10.1080/00343404.2014.1001732
  12. 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
  13. 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
  14. 10.2307/2392281
  15. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.003
  16. 10.1504/IJLIC.2004.004421
  17. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.03.005
  18. 10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00026-3
  19. 10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002
  20. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
  21. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00773.x
  22. 10.1287/orsc.7.2.136
  23. 10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010
  24. 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.002
  25. 10.1177/017084069501600201
  26. 10.1086/225469
  27. 10.1086/228311
  28. 10.1177/1056492613499203
  29. 10.2307/2667032
  30. 10.2307/2393655
  31. 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00830-6
  32. 10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
  33. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1976.tb00714.x
  34. 10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
  35. 10.2307/2118401
  36. 10.1080/00343400050005862
  37. 10.1002/9781444342277
  38. 10.1080/00208825.2001.11656825
  39. 10.4337/9781848449275
  40. 10.1016/j.joep.2007.06.004
  41. 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8
  42. 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00108.x
  43. 10.1177/a014106
  44. 10.1016/j.strueco.2008.10.003
  45. 10.23943/princeton/9780691148670.001.0001
  46. 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1993.tb00382.x
  47. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
  48. 10.1080/00343409950075461
  49. 10.1177/0149206307302554
  50. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.003
  51. 10.1177/019027250907200409
  52. 10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5
  53. 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
  54. 10.1108/01443570510593157
  55. 10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  56. 10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00031-9
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →