Abstract

Past research in intercultural business communication has laid a partial foundation for explaining Asian business communication. Asians are classified as high-context communicators and speak English in intercultural communication. Nevertheless, the relationship of language and culture on communication behaviors has remained unclear. To address this gap in the research, this study compares the communication behaviors of business professionals from two prominent Asian cultures—Japanese and Hong Kong Chinese—when these professionals participate in intercultural and intracultural decision-making meetings. The study reveals some differences in communication behaviors between the two cultural groups in both the intracultural and the intercultural meetings. Although both groups generally reflected their high-context communication orientations, they exhibited some deviations from the general discourse patterns, especially in the ways in which they expressed disagreements.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2013-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651913479918
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1086/294956
  2. 10.1075/japc.20.2.11ari
  3. 10.2307/2490389
  4. 10.1177/0893318999124003
  5. 10.1177/0021943605282373
  6. Bridging Japanese/North American differences
  7. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
  8. 10.1017/CBO9781139525329
  9. 10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050
  10. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  11. 10.1109/TPC.2011.2161844
  12. 10.1177/0261927X00019001002
  13. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00443.x
  14. 10.4135/9781412976176.n26
  15. 10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.003
  16. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
  18. 10.1075/prag.16.2-3.04tab
  19. 10.1075/japc.16.1.03tan
  20. 10.1007/978-3-540-30120-2_71
  21. 10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci048
  22. 10.1080/002075900399448
  23. 10.1515/text.1.1990.10.3.271
CrossRef global citation count: 27 View in citation network →