Smart Home Technology Diffusion in a Living Laboratory

David Wright Missouri University of Science and Technology ; Daniel B. Shank Missouri University of Science and Technology

Abstract

Smart home products continue to rise in popularity but have yet to achieve widespread adoption. There is little research on how the general population perceives benefits of different smart home devices beyond general surveys. Using a living laboratory of five solar houses that we equipped with a range of smart home devices, we assessed how university student residents learn about, use, and gain interest in adopting this smart home technology. Analysis of data confirms that users find lifestyle benefits to be the most important motivators for adopting smart home technology. Yet without training in using that technology, these benefits do not outweigh the risks associated with learning to operate that technology.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2020-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281619847205
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly

References (45) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1287/orsc.3.1.1
  2. 10.17705/1jais.00122
  3. 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.043
  4. 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.09
  5. Technology and culture
Show all 45 →
  1. Brush A. J., Lee B., Mahajan R., Agarwal S., Saroiu S., Dixon C. (2011, May). Home automation in the wild: Ch…
  2. Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach
  3. Medical innovations: A diffusion study
  4. 10.1353/tech.2013.0081
  5. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
  6. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
  7. 10.2307/249008
  8. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  9. 10.1080/14639230410001684387
  10. Greenough J. (2016, April 23). The US Smart Home Market has been struggling—Here’s how and why the market wil…
  11. 10.1007/s00779-006-0075-6
  12. Hargreaves T., Hauxwell-Baldwin R., Coleman M., Wilson C., Stankovic L., Stankovic V., Hassan T. M. (2014). …
  13. 10.1007/978-3-319-68018-7
  14. 10.1080/09613218.2017.1286882
  15. 10.1525/aa.2001.103.4.992
  16. Jakobi T., Ogonowski C., Castelli N., Stevens G., Wulf V. (2017, May). The catch (es) with smart home: Experi…
  17. 10.3102/0013189X033007014
  18. 10.2307/2090611
  19. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  20. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.07.025
  21. Issues in Educational Research
  22. Mennicken S., Huang E. M. (2012, June). Hacking the natural habitat: An in-the-wild study of smart homes, the…
  23. Mennicken S., Zihler O., Juldaschewa F., Molnar V., Aggeler D., Huang E. M. (2016, September). It’s like livi…
  24. 10.1017/S0002731600041263
  25. Journal of Aging Science
  26. Nyborg S., Røpke I. (2011, June). Energy impacts of the smart home-conflicting visions. In Conference proceed…
  27. Oliveira L. C., May A., Mitchell V., Coleman M., Kane T., Firth S. (2015). Pre-installa…
  28. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869599
  29. 10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5
  30. Diffusion of innovations
  31. Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research
  32. Shank, D. B., Graves, C., Gott, A., Gamez, P. & Rodriguez, S. (2019). Feeling our way to machine minds: Peopl…
  33. Shields N. (2018, March 9). THE US SMART HOME MARKET REPORT: Systems, apps, and devices leading to home autom…
  34. Takahashi D. (2017, January 31). PwC: 81% of consumers are aware of smart homes, but only 26%want one. …
  35. 10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001211
  36. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  37. MIS Quarterly
  38. Williams M. D., Rana N. P., Dwivedi Y. K., Lal B. (2011, June). Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sa…
  39. 10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0
  40. 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.047