Circularity, Analogy, and Gestalt in the Ancestral Puebloan Cannibalism Debate

Susan A. Youngblood Auburn University

Abstract

This study examines the controversy over alleged cannibalism in the prehistoric American Southwest as it played out in scholarly journals. It also examines the lessons those controversies provide technical communication. Data painstakingly collected from human remains at ancestral Pueblo sites have been interpreted as representing cannibalism and, alternatively, as indicating witchcraft, mutilation of the dead, and warfare. Three focal points of this study are the circular process of developing criteria for analysis in archaeology, the role of analogy in building hypotheses, and the role of gestalt in interpretation of the findings. This study also looks at the ways narratives contribute to knowledge building.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2012-04-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.42.2.b
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/2694812
  2. 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.08.001
  3. 10.1525/an.2005.46.4.13
  4. 10.2307/280828
  5. 10.2307/278342
  6. 10.1515/9781400852925
  7. 10.2307/2694819
  8. 10.2307/2694813
  9. 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.732
  10. 10.2307/2803522
  11. 10.1080/00231940.1991.11758180
  12. 10.1080/00231940.1982.11760575
  13. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.63
  14. 10.2307/1593819
  15. 10.1017/CBO9781139878302
  16. 10.2307/971972
  17. 10.1080/00231940.1992.11758208
  18. 10.2307/281880
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →