Perturbations in the Scientific Literature

Joseph E. Harmon Argonne National Laboratory

Abstract

In contrast to the literary artist we expect the scientist-writer to transmit information to the intended audience as accurately and clearly as possible. Nevertheless, a few scientists have managed to slip into their prose such rhetorical devices as anagram, acrostic, pun, metaphor, litotes, and neologism.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1986-10-01
DOI
10.2190/d0qt-9kkp-94wb-u60x
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (10)

  1. Koestler A., The Watershed: A Biography of Johannes Kepler, Doubleday and Company, Inc., New York, p. 200, 1960.
  2. Bird R. B., Stewart W. E., and Lightfoot E. N., Transport Phenomena, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 712–7…
  3. 10.1103/PhysRev.73.803
  4. Lewis G. N. and Randall M., Thermodynamics, 2nd edition, revised by Pitzer K. S. and Brewer L., McGraw-Hill B…
  5. Bates M. and Humphrey P. S. (eds.), The Darwin Reader, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, p. 433, 1956.
Show all 10 →
  1. Technical Communication
  2. 10.1038/171737a0
  3. 10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3
  4. Technical Communication
  5. Proceedings of 33rd International Communication Conference