Perturbations in the Scientific Literature

Joseph E. Harmon Argonne National Laboratory

Abstract

In contrast to the literary artist we expect the scientist-writer to transmit information to the intended audience as accurately and clearly as possible. Nevertheless, a few scientists have managed to slip into their prose such rhetorical devices as anagram, acrostic, pun, metaphor, litotes, and neologism.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1986-10-01
DOI
10.2190/d0qt-9kkp-94wb-u60x
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1103/PhysRev.73.803
  2. 10.1038/171737a0
  3. 10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →