Francis Bacon and <i>Plain</i> Scientific Prose: A Reexamination

Abstract

Though historical scholarship in technical writing has been sparse, what is available on Francis Bacon has tended to focus on Bacon's influence in directing scientific discourse toward the use of plain prose. This article shows that in many ways, Bacon's theory of rhetoric for specialized, knowledge-seeking fields directly conflicts with that of those who support plain prose for these fields. In addition, the rhetorical method Bacon utilized in presenting the theory has subverted the effect of much of his theory. Consequently, it is not surprising that Bacon's actual theory differs both from what was transferred to the Royal Society and from posterity's interpretation of it.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1985-04-01
DOI
10.2190/h7qa-a2pp-6naw-jdlq
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/356123
  2. 10.2190/NETC10
  3. 10.2190/NETC9
  4. 10.1177/002194368302000105
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →