Rhetoric and Sociobiology

Debra Journet Louisiana State University

Abstract

Although science and scientific communication have traditionally been considered objective and non-rhetorical, current thinking suggests that science is, to some degree, dependent on perception and belief, and that scientific communication reflects the values of its author. Sociobiology, a subset of evolutionary theory, considers the degree to which animal behavior is genetically determined. The question of the applicability of sociobiology to human behavior was brought to public attention by E. O. Wilson in Sociobiology [1], initiating a prolonged argument between Wilson and other scientists. This series of exchanges demonstrates a good deal of subjectivity on the part of the writers, and provides one example of a scientific debate that relies on traditional rhetorical techniques of persuasion.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1984-10-01
DOI
10.2190/fulx-qt45-6fjn-u8xb
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (10) · 1 in this index

  1. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis
  2. 10.2307/375964
  3. Kuhn T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, p. 94, 1962, 1970.
  4. 10.1080/10510978009368036
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Sociobiology and Behavior
  2. The Selfish Gene
  3. 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
  4. 10.1016/0162-3095(80)90012-6
  5. The Sociobiology Debate: Readings on Ethical and Scientific Issues