Abstract
A reader preference survey of engineers and scientists at the NASA Langley Research Center and in three professional/technical societies was conducted to determine the opinions of report users and producers concerning the format (organization) of NASA technical reports and the usage of technical report components. The survey questionnaire contained fourteen questions covering twelve survey topics. This article reports the findings of two survey topics: the components initially reviewed or read to determine whether to read a report in its entirety and the order in which report components are read.
- Journal
- Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- DOI
- 10.2190/jqly-7mf7-kabd-ldtx
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Hybrid
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026Rashid Ashraf; Said Badreddine; Mohamed I. Albeshr; Hamsa Al Ammari; Malik Muhammad Sheheryar Khan; Pranav Naithani
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026Joe Edward Hatfield
-
Written Communication May 2026Categorizing Human Identity in Writing Research: A Case for Participant Self-Identification in the Disaggregation of Data ↗Jennifer Burke Reifman
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026Suo Yan Mei; Suo Yan Ju; Zarima Mohd Zakaria