The Technical Writer-Readability Formulas and the Nontechnical Reader

Abstract

This article examines currently popular technical editorial practices in the preparation of communications directed at nontechnical readers. In light of these practices it presents source materials for reviewing readability research on available formulas and procedures, explaining their development, and demonstrating some of the benefits and pitfalls for editors and writers directing technical materials to the nontechnical reader. Concluding, the writer suggests that theoretical readability formula research become part of the corpus of information presented at pre- and in-service training programs for technical writers.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1977-10-01
DOI
10.2190/byt3-gj8a-1g6h-81yy
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (15) · 1 in this index

  1. The Measurement of Readability
  2. A Look at Readability Formulas
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. 10.2307/747086
  5. Dale E. and Chall J. S., A Formula for Predicting Readability, Educational Research Bulletin, pp. 11–20, 28, …
Show all 15 →
  1. How to Test Readability
  2. Standard Test Lessons in Reading: Teacher's Manual for All Books
  3. Dissertation Abstracts
  4. 10.1080/10862967609547171
  5. 10.1177/107769905303000401
  6. Elementary English
  7. Bormuth J., Comparable Cloze and Multiple Choice Comprehension Test Scores, Journal of Reading, pp. 291–299, …
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication