Communication: Is it the Transmission of Information?

Adnan Almaney DePaul University

Abstract

The way a person defines a term could have a significant effect on his behavior. In this article, the writer probes the behavioral pitfalls of defining communication as the “transmission” of information, and offers an alternative definition that may enhance communication effectiveness.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1974-04-01
DOI
10.2190/g89j-hnn0-ghw1-3dk1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (13)

  1. People, Society, and Mass Communication
  2. Schramm W., Roberts D. F. eds. The Process and Effects of Mass Communication, rev. ed., p. 8, University of I…
  3. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1953.tb01076.x
  4. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
  5. DeFleur Melvin L., Theories of Mass Communication, p. 91, David McKay Company, New York, 1966.
Show all 13 →
  1. Readings in Social Psychology
  2. Berlo David K., The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, p. 272, Holt, Rinehart …
  3. Newcomb T. M. Social Psychology, p. 3, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1965.
  4. Human Communication Theory
  5. Tagiuri R., Petrullo L. eds. Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior, p. 154, Standord University Press,…
  6. Langer distinguishes between signs and symbols in terms of their relationships with their referents and their…
  7. Mead George H., Mind, Self, and Society, p. 71, 17th Impression, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
  8. DeFleur, p. 89.