Abstract

ABSTRACT What pattern of mind is revealed by the increasingly common turn of phrase “I’m not surprised, but I am disappointed”? Three thinkers who though very influential elsewhere have little cache in contemporary ethical theory—Richard Rorty, Peter Sloterdijk, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick—suggest that what they call (respectively) knowingness, cynicism, and paranoid interpretation are endemic to our times. Building on their work, this article argues that knowing confirmation that the (terrible) way things are trending is what we expected all along has a deleterious effect on moral judgment. A knowing lack of surprise, which positions the speaker as savvy, weakens the judgment that follows. If what happened was expected, then the sense that something else could have happened is undercut. Against this mindset, the article synthesizes Rorty’s emphasis on hope with Sedgwick’s on affect, discussing political hope as a virtue with a significant affective dimension to be fostered.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.4.0367
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. “The Value of Hope.”
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  2. “‘A Monkish Kind of Virtue?’ For and Against Humility.”
    Political Theory  
  3. Virtue Epistemology
  4. “Aristotle on Hope.”
    Journal of the History of Philosophy  
  5. “The Primacy of Hope for Human Flourishing.”
    The Monist  
  6. “The Virtue of Hope.”
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice  
  7. “Aquinas on the Virtues of Hope: Theological and Democratic.”
    Journal of Religious Ethics  
  8. “The Art of Good Hope.”
    Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science  
  9. “Discovering the Virtue of Hope.”
    European Journal of Philosophy  
  10. Historical and Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Hope
  11. “Hope as a Political Virtue.”
    Philosophical Papers  
  12. “It’s Not What You Do, but What Everyone Else Does.”
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  
  13. “The Absurd.”
    Journal of Philosophy  
  14. Touching, Feeling
  15. “Hope as a Democratic Civic Virtue.”
    Metaphilosophy  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →