Vector Rhetoric: GPT’s Rhetorical Agency

Douglas Kulchar Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT The growing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) pose important questions for rhetorical theory and pedagogy. This article offers an overview of how LLMs like GPT work and a consideration of whether they should be considered rhetorical agents. To answer this question, the article considers structural and argumentative similarities in classical theorizations of rhetoric and the philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars. GPT’s particular method of encoding statistical patterns in language gives it some rudimentary semantics and reliably generates acceptable natural language output, so it should be considered to have a degree of rhetorical agency. But it is also badly limited by its restriction to written text, and an analysis of its interface shows that much of its rhetorical savvy is caused by the highly restricted rhetorical situation created by the ChatGPT interface.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-09-24
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.2.0194
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Knowledge, Consensus, and Rhetorical Theory.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  2. “Social Knowledge II.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  3. “Chatting with the Dead: The Hermeneutics of Thanabots.”
    Media, Culture & Society  
  4. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.”
    Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics  
  5. Potts, Liza, and AngelaHarrison. 2013. “Interfaces as Rhetorical Constructions: Reddit and 4chan during the B…
  6. “Corax and the Prolegomena.”
    American Journal of Philology  
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →