Vector Rhetoric: GPT’s Rhetorical Agency

Douglas Kulchar Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT The growing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) pose important questions for rhetorical theory and pedagogy. This article offers an overview of how LLMs like GPT work and a consideration of whether they should be considered rhetorical agents. To answer this question, the article considers structural and argumentative similarities in classical theorizations of rhetoric and the philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars. GPT’s particular method of encoding statistical patterns in language gives it some rudimentary semantics and reliably generates acceptable natural language output, so it should be considered to have a degree of rhetorical agency. But it is also badly limited by its restriction to written text, and an analysis of its interface shows that much of its rhetorical savvy is caused by the highly restricted rhetorical situation created by the ChatGPT interface.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-09-24
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.2.0194
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication

References (30) · 1 in this index

  1. The Ethical Fantasy of Rhetorical Theory
  2. Complete Works of Aristotle
  3. “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?”
    Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
  4. Brown, Tom B., BenjaminMann, NickRyder, MelanieSubbiah, JaredKaplan, PrafullaDhariwal, ArvindNeelakantan, et …
  5. “Who Was Corax?”
    Illinois Classical Studies
Show all 30 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. “Knowledge, Consensus, and Rhetorical Theory.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  3. “Social Knowledge II.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  4. “Post-Process but Not Post-Writing: Large Language Models and a Future for Composition Pe…
    Composition Studies
  5. “Chatting with the Dead: The Hermeneutics of Thanabots.”
    Media, Culture & Society  
  6. “Tisias and Corax and the Invention of Rhetoric.”
    Classical Quarterly
  7. “Placing in a Space of Norms: Neo-Sellarsian Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century.”
    The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy
  8. Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms
  9. The Pittsburgh School of Philosophy: Sellars, McDowell, Brandom
  10. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.”
    Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics  
  11. “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.”
    arXiv
  12. Perrigo, Billy. 2023. “Exclusive: The $2 Per Hour Workers Who Made ChatGPT Safer.”Time, 18Jan.https…
  13. Potts, Liza, and AngelaHarrison. 2013. “Interfaces as Rhetorical Constructions: Reddit and 4chan during the B…
  14. Radford, Alec, and KarthikNarasimhan. 2018. “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training.”htt…
  15. Radford, Alec, JeffWu, RewonChild, DavidLuan, DarioAmodei, and IlyaSutskever. 2019. “Language Models Are Unsu…
  16. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
  17. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind
  18. “Tokenizer.” n.d. Accessed September19, 2023. https://platform.openai.com/tokenizer.
  19. “I.—Computing Machinery and Intelligence.”
    Mind
  20. Vaswani, Ashish, NoamShazeer, NikiParmar, JakobUszkoreit, LlionJones, Aidan N.Gomez, LukaszKaiser, and IlliaP…
  21. “Large Language Models Write Answers.”
    Composition Studies
  22. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation
  23. “Corax and the Prolegomena.”
    American Journal of Philology  
  24. Wolfram, Stephen. 2023. “What Is ChatGPT Doing . . . and Why Does It Work?”14Feb.https://writings.s…
  25. “A Survey of Large Language Models.”
    arXiv