Abstract

ABSTRACT Africana scholars often address their texts to a reader who is implicitly white. This tendency, which this article characterizes as the “discursive orientation toward whiteness,” has the pernicious effect of limiting the range and rigor of scholars’ research questions and proposal. This analysis examines the other discursive “face,” following J. Saunders Redding’s observation from almost eighty years ago, which remains unnervingly insightful: “Negro [sic] writers have been obliged to have two faces . . . to satisfy two different (and opposed when not entirely opposite) audiences, the [B]lack and the white.” Scholars have described this second face in the text in a number of ways—variously as a temperament, a rhythm, or an “aesthetic.” Through an analysis of a few exemplary texts, the current study will describe a few of the most salient characteristics, ultimately in the service of equipping the “Black” scholar with a few effective, liberatory rhetorical strategies.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2023-07-04
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.56.1.0076
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. “On the Discursive Orientation toward Whiteness.”
    Journal of Intercultural Studies  
  2. “Don’t Talk to White People: On the Epistemological and Rhetorical Limitations of Convers…
    Journal of Black Studies  
  3. “Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls.”
    Southern Journal of Philosophy  
  4. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”
    Philosophical Review  
  5. “Should We Take Kant Literally?: On Alleged Racism in Observations on the Feeling of the …
    Philosophy and Literature  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →