The Meanings of What Can(not) be Said

Kundai Chirindo Lewis & Clark College

Abstract

ABSTRACT Motivated by a seeming disregard of the problem of speech proper in some rhetorical theorizing, I attempt to show the heuristic value of a semiological approach to what can(not) be said to rhetorical inquiry. I argue that attending to the specifics of speech, of its conditions of (im)possibility, is one way to arrive at rhetoric’s multiple compositions. To illustrate these points, I consider the case of what cannot be said from the perspective of speakers of Shona through an integrational philosophy of communication.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2022-04-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0025
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14) · 1 in this index

  1. The Shona & Zimbabwe, 900–1850: An Outline of Shona History
  2. “The Rhetorical Situation.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method
  4. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
  5. Integrational Linguistics and Philosophy of Language in the Global South
Show all 14 →
  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Harris, Roy. 2015. “Integrationism: A Very Brief Introduction.”http://www.royharrisonline.com/integrational_l…
  3. Integrational Linguistics and Philosophy of Language in the Global South
  4. Groundwork for the Practice of the Good Life: Politics and Ethics at the Intersection of …
  5. Integrational Linguistics and Philosophy of Language in the Global South
  6. African History: A Very Short Introduction
  7. Revolt in Southern Rhodesia 1896–7
  8. Origins of Rhodesia
  9. “Rhetoric’s Diverse Materiality: Polythetic Ontology and Genealogy.”
    Review of Communication