Entanglement and Ecstasy in Dance, Music, and Philosophy: A Reply to Carrie Noland, Nancy S. Struever, and Thomas Rickert

Philosophy & Rhetoric Mar 2021

Entanglement and Ecstasy in Dance, Music, and Philosophy: A Reply to Carrie Noland, Nancy S. Struever, and Thomas Rickert

Alva Noë University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dance and music serve in this essay to exemplify both the looping entanglement of art and life as well as the account of art and philosophy developed in Strange Tools. This essay replies to criticisms of Carrie Noland, Nancy S. Struever, and Thomas Rickert and also offers a briefer restatement of the general approach.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2021-03-12
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.54.1.0063
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

Struever (2020)

“Not Theory, Thought”: Collingwood's Early Work on Art

Philosophy & Rhetoric

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓

Di Paolo, Ezequiel A., Elena Clare Cuffari, and Hanne De Jaegher. 2018. Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity bet…

↗
Noë, Alva. 2012. Varieties of Presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

↗
Noë, Alva. 2017a. “Art and Entanglement in Strange Tools: Reply to Noëll Carroll, A.W. Eaton and Paul Guyer.”…

↗
Noë, Alva. 2017b. “The Writerly Attitude.” In Symbolic Articulation: Image, Word, and Body Between Action and…

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →

Entanglement and Ecstasy in Dance, Music, and Philosophy: A Reply to Carrie Noland, Nancy S. Struever, and Thomas Rickert

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (1)

Related Articles