A Theory of Fan-Type Dissociation

Martin Camper Loyola University Maryland

Abstract

ABSTRACTOne of the most important developments in twentieth-century rhetorical theory is Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's insight that concepts, when under strain, can be split or dissociated into two separate terms. Not a simple binary, these terms remain interconnected in a value hierarchy with one term serving as the normative frame for the other. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca theorize that either term can be dissociated further, producing a fan-type dissociation. Unlike ordinary dissociations, fan-types place three or more terms in hierarchical relationship, resulting in unique rhetorical features. Fanning a dissociation can serve three basic rhetorical functions: purging undesirable elements, preserving less undesirable elements from total devaluation, and purifying desirable elements. Building on these basic functions, rhetors can perform complex rhetorical actions, from intensifying a dissociation's values to completely undoing a dissociation. Long ignored by theorists and critics, fan-types complicate our understanding of dissociation, argumentation, and value-based reasoning, and therefore deserve more scholarly attention.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2020-11-20
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0433
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. Anderson, Amy K. 2015. “Dissociation and Visual Arguments: Creating Customers for Levy's Real Jewish Rye.” Ar…
  2. Camper, Martin. 2018. Arguing over Texts: The Rhetoric of Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1999. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Frank, David A. 2004. “Argumentation Studies in the Wake of The New Rhetoric.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40 (4…
  6. Goodwin, David. 1991. “Distinction, Argumentation, and the Rhetorical Construction of the Real.” Argumentatio…
  7. Hatch, Justin D. 2019. “Dissociating Power and Racism: Stokely Carmichael at Berkeley.” Advances in the Histo…
  8. Hochschild, Jennifer L., and Vesla Weaver. 2007. “The Skin Color Paradox and the American Racial Order.” Soci…
  9. Ritivoi, Andreea. 2008. “The Dissociation of Concepts in Context: An Analytic Template for Assessing Its Role…
  10. Stahl, Roger. 2002. “Carving Up Free Exercise: Dissociation and ‘Religion’ in Supreme Court Jurisprudence.” R…
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →