Abstract

ABSTRACT This article gives an account of the nature and purpose of Kant's poetic rhetoric in Dreams of a Spirit-Seer Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics. I argue that Kant employs a poetic mode of rhetoric in order to provoke a passionate, enthusiastic response in his audience. I go on to show that Kant became increasingly skeptical of poetic rhetoric's pathetic power after publishing Dreams. Ultimately, I demonstrate that Kant's confrontation with the Sturm und Drang led him to formulate a moral critique of poetic rhetoric and its tendency to undermine its audience's rational autonomy. I conclude by highlighting the significance of this critique in and for the development of Kant's mature rhetorical theory.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2017-02-21
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.50.1.0073
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (28)

  1. Abbott, Don Paul. 2007. “Kant, Theremin, and the Morality of Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (3): 274–92.
  2. Beiser, Frederick C. 1992. “Kant's Intellectual Development: 1746–1781.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, …
  3. Cassirer, Ernst. 1981. Kant's Life and Thought. Trans. James Haden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  4. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2011. Truth and Method. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.
  5. Gehrke, Pat J. 2002. “Turning Kant Against the Priority of Autonomy: Communication Ethics and the Duty to Com…
Show all 28 →
  1. Goetschel, Willi. 1994. Constituting Critique: Kant's Writing as Critical Praxis. Trans. Eric Schwab. Durham,…
  2. Hill, David, ed. 2003. Literature of the Sturm und Drang. Vol. 6. Rochester, NY: Camden House.
  3. Hove, Thomas. 2009. “Communicative Implications of Kant's Aesthetic Theory.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2): …
  4. Kant, Immanuel. 1902. Kants gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  5. Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Correspondence. Trans. Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Camb…
  7. Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. David Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge Universit…
  8. Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Notes and Fragments. Trans. Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer, and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridg…
  9. Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Laywine, Alison. 1993. Kant's Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. Atascadero, CA: R…
  11. Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2015. Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Schalow, Frank, and Richard Velkley, eds. 2014. The Linguistic Dimension of Kant's Thought: Historical and Cr…
  13. Schönfeld, Martin. 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Shell, Susan Meld. 1996. The Embodiment of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Shell, Susan Meld. 2009. Kant and the Limits of Autonomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  16. Stroud, Scott R. 2005. “Rhetoric and Moral Progress in Kant's Ethical Community.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 …
  17. Stroud, Scott R.. 2006. “Kant on Community: A Reply to Gehrke.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 39 (2): 157–65.
  18. Stroud, Scott R.. 2014. Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric. University Park: Penn State University Press.
  19. Velkley, Richard L. 1989. Freedom and the End of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Velkley, Richard L.. 2002. Being After Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  21. Vorländer, Karl. 1977. Immanuel Kant: Der Mann und der Werk. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner.
  22. Zammito, John H. 1992. The Genesis of Kant's “Critique of Judgment.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  23. Zammito, John H.. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.