How Pure Should Justice Be? Reflections on G. A. Cohen's Rhetorical Rescue

David Rondel University of Nevada, Reno

Abstract

AbstractIn this article I argue for two closely related conclusions: one concerned more narrowly with the internal consistency of G. A. Cohen's theorizing about justice and the unique rhetoric in which it is couched, the other connected to a more sweeping set of recommendations about how theorizing on justice is most promisingly undertaken. First, drawing on a famous insight of G. E. Moore, I argue that although the (Platonic) purity of Cohenian justice provides Cohen a platform from which to put some extremely challenging criticisms to Rawls and Rawlsian liberals, at the same time it generates a sort of self-referential paradox for many of the theses about the concept of justice to which Cohen himself is committed. I go on to conclude, using Rawls's theory of justice as a model, that it would serve political philosophy well to conceive of justice with less purity than Cohen conceives of it.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2016-08-22
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.49.3.0323
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.
  2. Arneson, Richard. 2008. “Justice Is Not Equality.” Ratio 21 (4): 371–91.
  3. Brennan, Jason. 2014. Why Not Capitalism? New York: Routledge.
  4. Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cohen, G. A. 2000. If You're An Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  7. Cohen, G. A. 2011. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Ed. Mich…
  8. Crisp, Roger. 2003. “Egalitarianism and Compassion.” Ethics 114 (1): 119–26.
  9. Davidson, Donald. 1996. “On The Folly of Trying to Define Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (6): 263–78.
  10. Kymlicka, Will. 2006. “Left-Liberalism Revisited.” In The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. C…
  11. Nagel, Thomas. 2002. Concealment and Exposure. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Narveson, Jan, and James Sterba. 2010. Are Liberty and Equality Compatible? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Pogge, Thomas. 2007. John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. Trans. Michelle Kosch. New York: Oxford Univ…
  14. Pogge, Thomas. 2008. “Cohen to the Rescue!” Ratio 21 (4): 454–75.
  15. Quong, Jonathan. 2010. “Justice Beyond Equality.” Social Theory and Practice 36 (2): 315–40.
  16. Rawls, John. 1987. “The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7 (1): 1–25.
  17. Temkin, Larry. 1993. Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Temkin, Larry. 2003. “Egalitarianism Defended.” Ethics 113 (4): 764–82.
  19. Tomlin, Patrick. 2010. “Internal Doubts About Cohen's Rescue of Justice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 …
  20. Williams, Andrew. 1998. “Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (3): 225–47.
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →