The Rhetoric of Enhancing the Human:

Kurt Zemlicka University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Abstract

ABSTRACT The task of this article is to explore the current state of bioethical debates over enhancement technologies as articulated through its two dichotomous ideological camps. It aims to explain why the conservative and posthumanist movements have reached a point where they fail to engage with each other and how we can reconceptualize the bioethical endeavor in a way that does not force the public to adhere to a framing of enhancement technologies as either universally desirable or abhorrent. In order to do so, I turn to the work of Lacan and Deleuze to explain why attempts to define what is essentially human always enter what I call “tropological regress,” or the endless procession of linguistic tropes that are artificially linked to transcendental conceptions of “the good.” I aim to diagnose why conservative and posthumanist discourses on enhancement technologies find themselves irreconcilably opposed.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2013-07-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.46.3.0257
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (20)

  1. Bertelsen, Lone, and Andrew Murphie. 2010. “An Ethics of Everyday Infinities and Power: Felix Guattari and th…
  2. Bostrom, Nick. 2008. “Dignity and Enhancement.” In Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the Pr…
  3. Bush, George W. 2001. Executive Order 13237.
  4. Copjec, Joan. 2006. “May '68, the Emotional Month.” In Lacan: The Silent Partners, ed. Slavoj Žižek, 90–114. …
  5. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Ma…
Show all 20 →
  1. Grossberg, Lawrence. 2010a. “Affect's Future: Rediscovering the Virtual in the Actual, an Interview by Gregor…
  2. Grossberg, Lawrence. 2010b. Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  3. Harris, John. 2007. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton …
  4. Hyde, Michael J. 2010. Perfection: Coming to Terms with Being Human. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
  5. Kass, Leon R. 2003. “Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Human Improvement.”bioethic…
  6. Lacan, Jacques. 1992. Seminar VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Dennis Porter. Ed. Jacques-Alain Mill…
  7. Lacan, Jacques. 1993. Seminar III: The Psychoses. Trans. Russell Grigg. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. London: Rou…
  8. Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits. Ed. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton.
  9. Levin, Yuval. 2003. “The Paradox of Conservative Bioethics.”New Atlantis 1 (Spring): 53–65.
  10. Lundberg, Christian. 2009. “Enjoying God's Death: The Passion of the Christ and the Practices of an Evangeli…
  11. Lundberg, Christian. 2012. Lacan in Public: Psychoanalysis and the Science of Rhetoric.Tuscaloosa: University…
  12. Macklin, Ruth. 2006. “The New Conservatives in Bioethics: Who Are They and What Do They Seek?”Hastings Cente…
  13. President's Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. bioethics…
  14. President's Council on Bioethics. 2008. Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's C…
  15. Sandel, Michael. 2002. “What's Wrong with Enhancement.”bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/background/sandelpaper.html.