Talking (About) the Elite and Mass:

Chris Ingraham University of Colorado Boulder

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe rhetorical tradition has long been concerned with how to negotiate the discursive juncture between mass and elite audiences. Such a concern has contributed to what might be characterized as the rhetorical tradition's anxiety with regard to its own status. In this article I suggest that this anxiety parallels an ontological conception of the elite as second-order in relation to the first-order mass. I use the standoff between novelist Jonathan Franzen and Oprah Winfrey in 2001 as a running example of status tensions in the public sphere, arguing for a theory of vernacular as language that talks and of specialized language as language that talks about. Finally, I suggest that the separate claims to status of vernacular and specialized language might be resolved by thinking further about Bakhtin's theory of heteroglossia.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2013-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.46.1.0001
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bernstein, Basil. 1964. “Elaborated and Restricted Codes: Their Social Origins and Some Consequences.” Americ…
  2. Blair, Carole. 1992. “Contested Histories of Rhetoric: The Politics of Preservation, Progress, and Change.” Q…
  3. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Burn, Stephen J. 2009. Jonathan Franzen at the End of Postmodernism. New York: Continuum.
  5. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. 1990a. “Object and Method in Rhetorical Criticism: From Wichelns to Leff and McGe…
  6. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. 1993. “The Idea of Rhetoric in the Rhetoric of Science.” Southern Communication J…
  7. Griffin, Leland. 1952. “The Rhetoric of Historical Movements.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 38 (2): 184–88.
  8. Habermas, Jürgen. 1974. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article.” Trans. Sam Lennox and Frank Lennox. New…
  9. Hariman, Robert. 1986. “Status, Marginality, and Rhetorical Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 72 (1): 38–54.
  10. Hauser, Gerard A. 1998. “Vernacular Dialogue and the Rhetoricality of Public Opinion.” Communication Monograp…
  11. Hauser, Gerard A. 2007. “Vernacular Discourse and the Epistemic Dimension of Public Opinion.” Communication T…
  12. Hauser, Gerard A. 2011. “Attending the Vernacular: A Plea for an Ethnographical Rhetoric.” In The Rhetorical …
  13. Hauser, Gerard A., and Erin D. McClellan. 2009. “Vernacular Rhetoric and Social Movements: Performances of Re…
  14. Howard, Robert. 2005. “A Theory of Vernacular Rhetoric: The Case of the ‘Sinner's Prayer’ Online.” Folklore 1…
  15. Howard, Robert. 2008. “The Vernacular Web of Participatory Media.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 25…
  16. McGee, Michael Calvin. 1990. “Text, Context, and the Fragmentation of Contemporary Culture.” Western Journal …
  17. Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Pri…
  18. Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 1995. “The Critique of Vernacular Discourse.” Communication Monographs 62: 19–46.
  19. Posner, Richard. 2002. Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Robbins, Bruce. 1990. “Interdisciplinarity in Public: The Rhetoric of Rhetoric.” Social Text 25–26: 103–18.
  21. Schiappa, Edward. 2001. “Second Thoughts on the Critiques of Big Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (3): 260–74.
  22. Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
  23. Wolfsdorf, David. 2008. Trials of Reason: Plato and the Crafting of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network →