Up from Memory:

Abstract

AbstractBooker T. Washington's Cotton States Exposition Address enlarges our understanding of the genre of witnessing by presenting a version of public testimony and historical remembrance sharply at odds with contemporary definitions of the genre. Washington's resolute choice to lend voice as a living witness to the atrocities of slavery in the service of conspicuously pragmatic and narrowly defined interests rather than universal human rights dramatically separates his performance of public witnessing from its late modern forms. Whereas survivors of historical atrocity in the post–World War II era ritually assume the difficult responsibility of testifying to past evils with the greatest possible accuracy, Washington relates the history of slavery—most notably its legacy of heinous human rights abuses—in radically inventive ways. The address demonstrates that those who embody the putative collective voice of subaltern communities may, in particular circumstances, call on the public to willfully forget, rather than somberly remember, the crimes of history. In doing so, the speech also suggests that the ability to bear witness may not automatically result in the ability to petition for equal human rights.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2012-06-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0189
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. College English
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. Booth, W. James. 2006. Communities of Memory: On Witness, Identity, and Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Universi…
  2. Browne, Stephen H. 1994. “‘Like Gory Spectres’: Representing Evil in Theodore Weld's American Slavery As It I…
  3. Chase, Richard. 1961. “The Classical Conception of Epideictic.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 47 (3): 293–300.
  4. Condit, Celeste M. 1985. “The Function of Epideictic: The Boston Massacre Orations as Exemplar.” Communicatio…
  5. Connerton, Paul. 2008. “Seven Types of Forgetting.” Memory Studies 1 (1): 59–71.
  6. Connerton, Paul. 2009. How Modernity Forgets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Harris, Thomas E., and Patrick C. Kennicott. 1972. “Booker T. Washington: A Study in Conciliatory Rhetoric.” …
  8. Heath, Robert L. 1978. “A Time for Silence: Booker T. Washington in Atlanta.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 …
  9. King, Andrew A. 1974. “Booker T. Washington and the Myth of Heroic Materialism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech …
  10. Logue, Cal M. 1977. “The Rhetorical Appeals of Whites to Blacks During Reconstruction.” Communication Monogra…
  11. Margalit, Avishai. 2002. The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Ober, Josiah, and Barry Strauss. 1990. “Drama, Political Rhetoric, and the Discourse of Athenian Democracy.” …
  13. Poulakos, John. 1986. “Gorgias' and Isocrates' Use of the Encomium.” Southern Speech Communication Journal 51…
  14. Poulakos, Takis. 1987. “Isocrates's Use of Narrative in the Evagoras: Epideictic, Rhetoric and Moral Action.”…
  15. Poulakos, Takis. 1990. “Historiographies of the Tradition of Rhetoric: A Brief History of Classical Funeral O…
  16. Ricoeur, Paul. 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: Univers…
  17. Vivian, Bradford. 2006. “Neoliberal Epideictic: Rhetorical Form and Commemorative Politics on September 11, 2…
  18. Vivian, Bradford. 2009. “On the Language of Forgetting.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 95 (1): 89–104.
  19. Wilson, Kirt H. 2002. Reconstruction's Desegregation Debate: The Politics of Equality and the Rhetoric of Pla…
  20. Woodward, C. Vann. 2002. The Strange Career of Jim Crow. New York: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →