Universalities

James Crosswhite University of Oregon

Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2010 Universalities James Crosswhite James Crosswhite Department of English University of Oregon Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 430–448. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0430 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation James Crosswhite; Universalities. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 430–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0430 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0430
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  2. Advances in the History of Rhetoric

References (27) · 1 in this index

  1. Aeschylus. 1969. Aeschylus I: Oresteia. Trans. Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Aikin, Scott. 2008. “Perelmanian Universal Audience and the Epistemic Aspirations of Argument.” Philosophy an…
  3. Appiah, Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  4. Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univer…
Show all 27 →
  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambrid…
  2. Derrida, Jacques. 1977. “Signature Event Context.” Trans. Samuel Weber and Jeffrey Mehlman. Glyph 1:172–97.
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Ede, Lisa S. 1981. “Rhetoric Versus Philosophy: The Role of the Universal Audience in Chaïm Perelman's The Ne…
  5. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 1995. “Perelman and the Fallacies.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (…
  6. Gross, Alan G. 1999. “A Theory of the Rhetorical Audience: Reflections on Chaïm Perelman.” Quarterly Journal …
  7. Gross, Alan G., and Ray D. Dearin. 2003. Chaim Perelman. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  8. Harris, Randy. 2008. “Cognitive Dimensions of the Universal Audience.” Paper presented at “The Promise of Rea…
  9. Johnstone, Henry W. 1978. “New Outlooks on Controversy.” Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument: An …
  10. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Poli…
  11. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: Univ…
  12. Maneli, Mieczysław. 1994. Perelman's New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century. Dordrec…
  13. Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
  14. Perelman, Chaïm. 1984a. “The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments.” Trans. Ray D. Dea…
  15. Perelman, Chaïm. 1984b. “Rhetoric and Politics.” Trans. James Winchester and Molly Black Verene. Philosophy a…
  16. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John…
  17. Plato. 1982. Protagoras. Trans. B. A. F. Hubbard and E. S. Karnovsky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Ray, John W. 1978. “Perelman's Universal Audience.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 (4): 361–75.
  19. Scult, Allen. 1976. “Perelman's Universal Audience: One Perspective.” Communication Studies 27 (3): 176–80.
  20. Tindale, Christopher W. 1999. Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany: State University of Ne…
  21. Tindale, Christopher W. 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, and G. E. M. Anscombe. 2001 [1953]. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.