Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2007 Theoretical Pieties, Johnstone's Impiety, and Ordinary Views of Argumentation Jean Goodwin Jean Goodwin Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2007) 40 (1): 36–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655257 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Jean Goodwin; Theoretical Pieties, Johnstone's Impiety, and Ordinary Views of Argumentation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2007; 40 (1): 36–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655257 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University2007The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.2307/25655257
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (25) · 1 in this index

  1. Baker, George Pierce and Henry Barrett Huntington. 1905. The Principles of Argumentation, Revised and Augment…
  2. Ehninger, Douglas, and Wayne Brockriede. 1963. Decision by Debate. New York: Dodd, Mead.
  3. Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Marie Secor. 1990. A Rhetoric of Argument, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  4. Foster, William Trufant. 1908. Argumentation and Debating. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  5. Freeley, Austin J., and David L. Steinberg. 2000. Argumentation and Debate, 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Show all 25 →
  1. Herrick, James A. 2004. Argumentation: Understanding and Shaping Arguments, updated ed. State College, PA: St…
  2. Hollihan, Thomas A., and Kevin T. Baaske. 2005. Arguments and Arguing: The Products and Process of Human Deci…
  3. Inch, Edward S., and Barbara Warnick. 2002. Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argumen…
  4. Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1954. “Some Aspects of Philosophical Disagreement.” Dialectica 8:245-57.
  5. -. 1959. Philosophy and Argument. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP.
  6. -. 1962. “Reason Limited.” In Essays in Philosophy, 115-32. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP.
  7. -. 1963. “Some Reflections on Argumentation.” Logique et Analyse 6.21-24:30-39.
  8. -. 1967. “Controversy and Selfhood.” Journal of General Education 19:48-56.
  9. -. 1971. “Some Trends in Rhetorical Theory.” In The Prospect of Rhetoric, ed. Lloyd Bitzer and Edwin Black, 7…
  10. -. 1978a. “From Philosophy to Rhetoric and Back.” In Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Literature: An Exploration, ed…
  11. -. 1978b. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument: An Outlook in Transition. Uni- versity Park: Penns…
  12. -. 1980. “Rhetoric and Death.” In Rhetoric in Transition, ed. Eugene E. White, 61-70. University Park: Pennsy…
  13. -. 1982. “Communication: Technology and Ethics.” In Communication, Philosophy, and the Technological Age, ed.…
  14. -. 1989. “Self-Application in Philosophical Argumentation.” Metaphilosophy 20:247-61.
  15. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  16. Patterson, J. W., and David Zarefsky. 1983. Contemporary Debate. Boston, MA: Houghton Mif- flin.
  17. Rieke, Richard D., Malcolm O. Sillars, and Tarla Rai Peterson. 2005. Argumentation and Critical Decision Maki…
  18. Rybacki, Karyn Charles, and Donald Jay Rybacki. 2004. Advocacy and Opposition: An Introduction to Argumentati…
  19. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1990. “Rhetoric and Relevance.” In The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, P…
  20. Williams, Joseph M., and Gregory G. Colomb. 2001. The Craft of Argument. New York: Long- man.