Journal of Response to Writing Jun 2021 RSS Open Access

Written Corrective Feedback in EFL: Combining Error Codes and Metalinguistic Explanation

Ogawa, Yoshimasa

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effects of a combined form of written corrective feedback (WCF) on English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ writing accuracy. The combined WCF consisted of unfocused error-code WCF and focused metalinguistic explanation. Different forms of WCF were administered to two groups of Japanese EFL students in two consecutive years, and the effects of the feedback were compared based on the number of grammatical errors that the students made before and after receiving feedback. The original version (single combined WCF) provided metalinguistic explanation only once for each of eight target grammatical forms, whereas the intensive version (repeated combined WCF) provided metalinguistic explanation repeatedly. The results showed that combined WCF facilitated the students’ accurate use of the target forms overall, and repeated combined WCF was more effective than single combined WCF, but its efficacy weakened over time. Repeated combined WCF had a positive effect on students’ accurate use of verb tense and the avoidance of informal usage; single combined WCF had a significant effect only on verb tense. Repeated combined WCF also served to reduce the total number of errors, including errors for which no metalinguistic explanation was given, implying that coded WCF had its own contribution to the students’ writing accuracy.

Journal
Journal of Response to Writing
Published
2021-06-09
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Citation data not yet available for this article.

Citation data is not available for Journal of Response to Writing. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Examining Automated Writing Evaluation Error Coverage in Relation to Uptake and Retention ↗
    Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh; Rahimi, Mohammad; Link, Stephanie
    genre theory writing pedagogy teacher development revision assessment artificial intelligence multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  2. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗
    Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht
    assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  3. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Pursuing fair writing assessment: Halo effects in primary school foreign language writing in grade six ↗
    Ruth Trüb; Julian Lohmann; Jens Möller; Stefan D. Keller
    assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  4. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    The effects of online resource use on L2 learners’ computer-mediated writing processes and written products ↗
    Honglan Wang; Jookyoung Jung
    revision argument assessment digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics affect and writing
  5. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    How reliable and valid is peer evaluation in adolescents’ L2 argumentative writing? ↗
    Albert W. Li; Steve Graham
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies