Scientist Citizens: Rhetoric and Responsibility in L’Aquila

Pamela Pietrucci University of the Humanities ; Leah Ceccarelli

Abstract

AbstractIn this essay, we analyze the public communication debacle before the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake that led to the infamous trial of the “L’Aquila Seven.” Examining the trial transcripts to extract norms regarding the proper role of scientists in society, we conclude that the first verdict interpellated the figure of the responsible scientist citizen who is expected to perform rhetorical citizenship when communicating with a lay public, while the second assumed a distinction between public and technical spheres that absolves scientists from responsibility to their fellow citizens and reduces their role to performance of an expertise divorced from rhetoric. Tracing the civic outcomes of these conflicting norms, we identify three missed opportunities during the prequake discourse in which the scientists failed to correct statements that they, and only they, knew to be flawed. To prevent future communicative debacles that arise from a dangerous separation of scientists and laypeople, we argue that scientists need to come to see themselves as scientist citizens, experts who take on the civic responsibility of clearly communicating their knowledge to their fellow citizens when such sharing is necessary to the public good.

Journal
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published
2019-03-01
DOI
10.14321/rhetpublaffa.22.1.0095
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Poroi
  3. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 5. For rhetoricians, the seminal article distinguishing technical and public spheres is G. Thomas Goodnight, …
  2. 8. Carolyn R. Miller, “The Presumptions of Expertise: The Role of Ethos in Risk Analysis,” Configurations 11 …
  3. 11. Heather E. Douglas, Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh P…
  4. 12. Thomas H. Jordan quoted in Edwin Cartlidge, “Prison Terms for L’Aquila Experts Shock Scientists,” Science…
  5. 13. Thomas H. Jordan, "Scapegoat Shocker," New Scientist, September 24, 2011, 35. See also Nicola Nosengo, "L…
  6. 15. Emina Herovic, Timothy L. Sellnow, and Kathryn E. Anthony, “Risk Communication as Interacting Arguments: …
  7. 16. Marouf Hasian Jr., Nicholas S. Paliewicz, and Robert W. Gehl, “Earthquake Controversies, the L’Aquila Tri…
  8. 18. Danielle DeVasto, “Being Expert: L’Aquila and Issues of Inclusion in Science-Policy Decision Making,” Soc…
  9. 19. Sally Jackson, “Black Box Arguments and Accountability of Experts to the Public,” in Between Scientists a…
  10. and Michael Leff, "Isocrates, Tradition, and the Rhetorical Version of Civic Education," in Isocrates and Civ…
  11. 22. Michele Kennerly, “The Stoic Nature of Early Dramatistic Theory,” Advances in the History of Rhetoric 14 …
  12. 23. Kock and Villadsen, “Citizenship as Rhetorical Practice,” 1–2.
  13. 24. Robert Asen, “A Discourse Theory of Citizenship,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90 (2004): 191.
  14. 25. Christian Kock and Lisa Villadsen, “Introduction. Rhetorical Citizenship as Conceptual Frame: What We Tal…
  15. 26. Kwame Anthony Appiah, “The Democratic Spirit,” Daedalus 142 (2013): 215.
  16. 27. Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne, “Introduction,” in Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Sci…
  17. 28. Sheila Jasanoff, “A Mirror for Science,” Public Understanding of Science 23 (2014): 24.
  18. 29. Rolf Lidskog, “Scientised Citizens and Democratised Science: Re-assessing the Expert-Lay Divide,” Journal…
  19. 35. Silvio O. Funtowicz and Jerome R. Ravetz, "Science for the Post-Normal Age," Futures 25 (1993): 739-55
  20. and Alan Irwin, "Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Bioscience," Public Unders…
  21. 63. Enzo Boschi, “L’Aquila’s Aftershocks Shake Scientists,” Science, September 27, 2013, 1451.
  22. 64. Paul M. Dombrowski, "Can Ethics Be Technologized? Lessons from Challenger, Philosophy, and Rhetoric," IEE…
  23. and Dennis S. Gouran, Randy Y. Hirokawa, and Amy E. Martz, "A Critical Analysis of Factors Related to Decisio…
CrossRef global citation count: 29 View in citation network →