Abstract

Abstract This essay makes two key arguments. The first is that preemptive politics often rely on strategies of rhetorical irony to cultivate perceptions of reasonableness, humility, and dialectical transcendence. As such, I expand the rhetorical conception of Stephen Skowronek's “political time” thesis to reveal its dimensions as a Burkean “ironic development.” The second argument is that Barack Obama's rhetorical strategy more directly fits the typology of preemptive presidents than that of reconstructive presidents, making him far more comparable in “political time” with Richard Nixon than with Ronald Reagan. I proceed to analyze the two presidential candidates' rhetoric in their first winning campaigns for the presidency to discern the extent of these parallels and reveal the applicability of an ironist political style in preemptive electoral situations. The essay concludes by examining the trajectory of liberalism in political time and the implications of this analysis for preemptive “wild cards” in presidential rhetoric.

Journal
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published
2013-03-01
DOI
10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0059
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Entelechial and Reformative Symbolic Trajectories in Contemporary Conservatism: A Case S…
    Rhetoric & Public Affairs  
  2. “Richard Nixon's 1968 Acceptance Speech as a Model of Dual Audience Adaptation,”
    Today's Speech  
  3. “Under the Veneer: Nixon's Vietnam Speech of November 3, 1969,”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  4. “Irony, Silence, and Time: Frederick Douglass on the Fifth of July,”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  5. “Reaffirmation and Subversion of the American Dream,”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  6. “Recasting the American Dream and American Politics: Barack Obama's Keynote Address to th…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  7. “Nixon, Agnew, and the ‘Silent Majority’: A Case Study in the Rhetoric of Polarization,”
    Western Speech  
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →