Abstract

Abstract At the University of Minnesota, Rochester, a small health sciences school, writing faculty piloted their own versions of ungrading catered to the accessibility needs of students. Ubbesen experimented with what she calls “credit-based assessment” where students receive a zero through four score on all assignments. Bruenger experimented with assigning credit or no credit to all assignments. And Lemer experimented with not assigning grades at all until the final required one. This article describes these ungrading schemes, analyzes student responses to them, and promotes ungrading as an accessible practice for teachers and learners.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-11246287
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (8) · 2 in this index

  1. The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading
  2. Elliot Norbert . 2016. “A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment.” Jour…
  3. Let's Talk about Grading
  4. Inoue Asao, B. 2015. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies:…
  5. Kryger Kathleen , and ZimmermanGriffin. X. 2020. “Neurodivergence and In…
Show all 8 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. College English
  3. How to Ungrade