You Don't Know Jack

Abstract

Many students in American universities are unable to absorb information from a Shakespeare text in the lecture-discussion format. Consumption of electronic media has both absorbed increasing amounts of their time and encouraged passive modes of learning. My response is to seek a pedagogy that produces, on the one hand, in active interpreters of complex language, and, on the other, a participatory, collegial classroom through a pedagogy fusing traditional modes of literary criticism with active modes of learning.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2011-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2010-020
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Pedagogy

References (31) · 2 in this index

  1. Ausubel, David Paul. 1978. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. 2nd ed. Evanston, IL: Holt.
  2. Bain, Ken. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Berkowitz, Gerald. 1984. “Teaching Shakespeare to Today's College Students — Some Heresies.” Shakespeare Quar…
  5. Berry, Cicely. 1992. The Actor and the Text. New York: Applause.
Show all 31 →
  1. Casselman, Anne. 2005. “Does E-mail Make You Dumber?” Discover Magazine, 6 August. discovermagazine.com/2005/…
  2. Commonsense Media. 2009. “Social Networks and Teen Lives.” 10 August. www.commonsensemedia.org/social-network…
  3. Demasio, Antonio. 2000. The Feeling of What Happens. London: Vintage.
  4. Dundes, Lauren, and Jeff Marx. 2006 – 7. “Balancing Work and Academics in College.” Journal of College Studen…
  5. Filene, Peter. 2005. The Joy of Teaching. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  6. Fiske, Edward B., ed. 1999. Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning. Arts Education Partnersh…
  7. Graff, Gerald. 2003. Clueless in Academe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  8. Greenblatt, Stephen. 1989. Shakespearean Negotiations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. Pedagogy
  10. Jensen, Eric. 2005. Teaching with the Brain in Mind. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and …
  11. Kermode, Frank. 2000. Shakespeare's Language. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
  12. Linklater, Kristin. 1992. Freeing Shakespeare's Voice. New York: Theatre Communications Group.
  13. Marsal, Katie. 2009. “High School Teens Say They'll Plunk Down $500 for iPhone.” AppleInsider, 9 April. www.a…
  14. Nielsen Company. 2008. “Texting Now More Popular than Calling.” 23 September. www.fiercewireless.com/press-re…
  15. Olsen, Stephanie. 2006. “Teens and Media: A Full-Time Job.” CNET News.com, 7 December. news.cnet.com/2100-104…
  16. Reynolds, Peter. 1991. Practical Approaches to Teaching Shakespeare. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Roberts, Donald F., Ulla G. Foehr, and Victoria Rideout. 2005. Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8 – 18 Yea…
  18. Rodenberg, Patsy. 2002. Speaking Shakespeare. London: Methuen.
  19. Shakespeare, William. 2007. The RSC Shakespeare Complete Works, ed. Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen. New Yor…
  20. Sisken, H. Jay. 1987. “Rewriting the Reading Lesson: Developing Reading Proficiency through Pre-reading Activ…
  21. Stredder, James. 2004. The North Face of Shakespeare. Stratford: Wincot.
  22. Tucker, Patrick. 2002. Secrets of Acting Shakespeare. New York: Routledge.
  23. Wallis, Claudia. 2006. “The Multitasking Generation.” Time, 27March, 48 – 56.
  24. Williams, Tannis MacBeth. 1986. The Impact of Television. Orlando: Academic.
  25. Wilson, Connie. 2008. “Is Reading in America a Dying Pursuit?” Associated Content, 5 March. www.associatedcon…
  26. Wright, George T. 1981. “Hendiadys and Hamlet.” PMLA96: 168 – 93.