Abstract

Engaging the term rhetoricity, which refers both to Cultural Literacy as text and cultural literacy as concept, Cook claims that the most productive pedagogical component of Hirsch's proposal—the sophisticated rhetorical sensibility on which the entire conceptual edifice of cultural literacy depends—was obfuscated by the book's lightening-rod ethos, its deceptively simple veneer, and its smugly casual presumption to name “what every American needs to know.”

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2009-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2009-008
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. College English
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. College English
  4. College English
  5. College English
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Christenbury, Leila. 1989. “Cultural Literacy: A Terrible Idea Whose Time Has Come.” English Journal78: 14–17.
  2. Hirsch, E. D., Jr. 1985. “`Cultural Literacy' Doesn't Mean `Core Curriculum.'” English Journal74: 47–49.
  3. ———. 1989. “From Model to Policy.” New Literary History20: 451–56.
  4. “NCTE to You.” 1988. English Journal77: 105–9.
  5. Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Pri…
  6. Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. 1992. “Cult-Lit: Hirsch, Literacy, and the `National Culture.'” In The Politics of…
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →