Abstract

Research Article| October 01 2005 Using Shakespeare's King Lear to Teach Symmetry, Metaphor, and the Rhetorical Question Kathleen McEvoy Kathleen McEvoy Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2005) 5 (3): 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-5-3-409 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Kathleen McEvoy; Using Shakespeare's King Lear to Teach Symmetry, Metaphor, and the Rhetorical Question. Pedagogy 1 October 2005; 5 (3): 409–426. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-5-3-409 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2005 Duke University Press2005 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Articles You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2005-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-5-3-409
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (22)

  1. Bensel-Meyers, L. 1992. Rhetoric for Academic Reasoning. New York: HarperCollins.
  2. Corbett, Edward P. J. 1971. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Doran, Madeleine. 1976. “ `Give Me the Map There!' Command, Question, and Assertion in King Lear.” In Shakesp…
  4. Gibson, Rex. 1992. “Shakespeare's Rhetoric in Action.” In Rebirth of Rhetoric: Essays in Language, Culture, a…
  5. Greenblatt, Stephen. 1997. “Introduction toKing Lear.” In Greenblatt et al. 1997: 2307-16.
Show all 22 →
  1. Greenblatt, Stephen, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katharine Eisaman Maus, eds. 1997. The Norton Shakespe…
  2. Horner, Winifred Bryan. 1988. Rhetoric in the Classical Tradition. New York: St. Martin's.
  3. Ioppolo, Grace. 1991. Revising Shakespeare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Kaufer, David, and Gary Waller. 1985. “To Write Is to Read Is to Write, Right?” In Reading and Writing Differ…
  5. Langford, Thomas A. 1991. “Cordelia and the Rhetoric of Righteousness.” Literature and Belief11:13-26.
  6. Liston, William T. 1997. “Paraphrasing Shakespeare.” In Salomone and Davis 1997:11-17.
  7. McArthur, Tom. 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Micheli, Linda M. 1981. “ `The Thing Itself':Literal and Figurative Language in King Lear.” Philological Quar…
  9. Moss, Leonard. 1987a. “Rhetorical Addition inKing Lear (Part One).” Language and Style20:16-29.
  10. ———. 1987b. “Rhetorical Addition in King Lear (Part Two).” Language and Style20:171-84.
  11. Newman, Karen. 1988. “The Inward Springs:Shakespeare's Rhetoric of Character.” Language and Style21:191-202.
  12. Ray, Robert H., ed. 1986. Approaches to Teaching Shakespeare's King Lear. New York: Modern Language Association.
  13. Salomone, Ronald E., and James E. Davis, eds. 1997.Teaching Shakespeare into the Twenty-First Century. Athens…
  14. Shakespeare, William. 1997. King Lear (confl ated text). In Greenblatt et al. 1997:2479-553.
  15. Tayler, Edward W. 1990. “King Lear and Negation.” English Literary Renaissance20: 17-39.
  16. Taylor, Gary, and Michael Warren, eds. 1983.The Division of the Kingdoms. Oxford: Clarendon.
  17. Thomas, Sidney. 1995. “The Integrity of King Lear.” Modern Language Review90: 572-84.