Abstract

Review Article| April 01 2005 Persuasion and Argument: Coterminous? Patricia Bizzell Patricia Bizzell Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2005) 5 (2): 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-5-2-317 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Patricia Bizzell; Persuasion and Argument: Coterminous?. Pedagogy 1 April 2005; 5 (2): 317–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-5-2-317 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2005 Duke University Press2005 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2005-04-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-5-2-317
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (9) · 3 in this index

  1. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Refl ections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed…
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Bizzell, Patricia. 2002. “The Intellectual Work of `Mixed' Forms of Academic Discourse.” In ALT DIS: Alternat…
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Harvey, Gordon C. 2000. “`Sources' of What?” Writing with Sources Panel. Conference on College Composition an…
Show all 9 →
  1. College English
  2. Shaughnessy, Mina. 1977a. Errors and Expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. ———. 1977b. “Some Needed Research on Writing.” College Composition and Communication28:317-20.
  4. Sperber, Murray. 2000. Beer and Circus: How Big-Time College Sports Is Crippling Undergraduate Education. New…