Pedagogy Jan 2004

Literary Meaning and the Question of Value: Victorian Literary Interpretation

Suzy Anger

Abstract

Recent attention to the institutionalization of English literature has reminded us that the academic study of literature has a short history, with literature entering the universities as a subject only at the end of the nineteenth century. It is worth remembering that what we do now in the classroom has a history, one that has consequences for our classroom practice. We take it for granted now, however much concern for context and culture has become part of our practice, that interpretation is one of the fundamental responsibilities of the critic. But widespread interpretation of secular texts has a relatively short history and grew out of a tradition of Biblical hermeneutics. In considering that secular transition, I want to suggest that our practice in teaching both the Victorians and the history of criticism needs to be modified to come to terms with the literary sophistication with which the Victorians are rarely credited, and, more important yet, to throw light on our current critical practice by showing the kinds of problems literary interpretation faced as it developed out of the religious hermeneutic tradition. It is sometimes assumed that interest in the theory of literary interpretation is a twentieth-century phenomenon. Anglo-American critics in earlier periods did not reflect on the problems of interpretation; they simply took meaning for granted and pushed on straightaway to make evaluative or ethical judgments on a text’s literary merits or content. Discussing eighteenthand nineteenth-century British criticism, for instance, K. M. Newton (1990: 1–2)

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-4-1-27
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
teacher development literary studies
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (35)

  1. Arnold, Matthew. 1968. The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. R. H. Super. Ann Arbor: University of …
  2. Benzie, William. 1983. Dr. F. J. Furnivall:A Victorian Scholar Adventurer. Norman, Okla.:Pilgrim.
  3. Browning Society's Papers.1881–92. 3 vols. London: Trubner and Co.
  4. Court, Franklin E. 1992. Institutionalizing English Literature: The Culture and Politics of Literary Study,17…
  5. Crosby, Christina, et al. 2002. “The Changing Profession: Why Major in Literature—What Do We Tell Our Student…
     ↗
Show all 35 →
  1. Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations40: 81-128.
     ↗
  2. Dekkers, Odin. 1998. J. M. Robertson:Rationalist and Literary Critic. Brookfield, Vt.:Ashgate.
  3. Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology, trans. G. Spivak. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4. Dowden, Edward. 1886. “The Interpretation of Literature.” Contemporary Review49: 701-19.
  5. Engell, James. 1989. Forming the Critical Mind: Dryden to Coleridge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  6. Foucault, Michel. 1975. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception, trans. A. W. Sheridan S…
  7. Furnivall, F. J. 1874. The Succession of Shakspere's Works and the Use of Metrical Tests in Settling It. Lond…
  8. Gross, John. 1969. The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters. New York: Macmillan.
  9. Halliday, F. E. 1957. The Cult of Shakespeare. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co.
  10. Hancher, Michael. 1970. “The Science of Interpretation and the Art of Interpretation.” Modern Language Notes8…
     ↗
  11. Hudson, William Henry. 1896. Studies in Interpretation. London: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
  12. Jowett, Benjamin. 2000 [1859]. “On the Interpretation of Scripture.” In Essays and Reviews: The 1860 Text and…
  13. Lewes, George Henry. 1964 [1843]. “Augustus Wilhelm Schlegel.” Foreign Quarterly Review32, no. 9 (1843): 164-…
     ↗
  14. McPherson, Robert G. 1959. Theory of Higher Education in Nineteenth-Century England. Athens: University of Ge…
  15. Moulton, Richard G. 1893 [1885].Shakespeare As a Dramatic Artist: A Popular Illustration of the Principles of…
  16. ———. 1915. The Modern Study of Literature: An Introduction to Literary Theory and Interpretation. Chicago: Un…
  17. Newton, K. M. 1990. Interpreting the Text:A Critical Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Literary Inte…
  18. Palmer, D. J. 1965. The Rise of English Studies. London: Oxford University Press.
  19. Pater, Walter. 1984. The Renaissance in Selected Writings of Walter Pater, ed. Harold Bloom. New York:Signet.
  20. Peterson, William S. 1969. Interpreting the Oracle: A History of the London Browning Society. Athens: Ohio Un…
  21. Potter, Stephen. 1937. The Muse in Chains. London: Jonathan Cape.
  22. Ruskin, John. 1983 [1864]. “Of Kings'Treasuries.” Sesames and Lilies. New York:Chelsea.
  23. Schoenbaum, S. 1991. Shakespeare's Lives. Oxford: Clarendon.
  24. Small, Ian. 1991. Conditions for Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     ↗
  25. Stavisky, Aron Y. 1969. Shakespeare and the Victorians. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  26. Steeves, Harrison Ross. 1913. Learned Societies and English Literary Scholarship in Great Britain and the Uni…
     ↗
  27. Swinburne, Algernon. 1926. A Study of Shakespeare. In Prose Works, vol. 1 of The Complete Works of Algernon C…
  28. Symonds, John Addington. 1907 [1890].Essays Speculative and Suggestive. 3d ed. London:Smith, Elder, and Co.
  29. Wilde, Oscar. 1989. “The Critic As Artist.” In Complete Works of Oscar Wilde. New York: Harper and Row.
  30. Wimsatt, William K., Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley.1954. “The Intentional Fallacy.” In The Verbal Icon: Studie…
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing literary studies editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    “We Have to Be Detectives” ↗
    Bridget C. Donnelly
    teacher development literary studies
  3. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Teaching Intersectionality in the Age of Intersectionality ↗
    Elisabeth Windle
    writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development race and writing gender and writing literary studies
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter