Expectation, Reality, and Rectification: The Merits of Failed Service Learning
Suzanne Kesler Rumsey
Purdue University Fort Wayne
;
Tanja Nihiser
Purdue University Fort Wayne
Abstract
Prompted by Cushman’s and Grabill’s call to “ask and answer the difficult questions” about service learning (Reflections 2009), this article addresses the difficult question of “what happens when service learning goes wrong.” Authors engaged in family history writing and service learning with a local historical group. When the project was unable to be sustained, authors theorized a three-part methodological continuum of expectation, reality, and rectification to articulate the merits of failed attempts at service learning.
- Journal
- Community Literacy Journal
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- DOI
- 10.25148/clj.5.2.009416
- Open Access
- OA PDF Bronze
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
CrossRef global citation count: 1
View in citation network →
Related Articles
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026Girdharry, Kristi
-
College Composition and Communication Feb 2026Jessica Pauszek; Veronica House; Paula Mathieu
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2026Toward a Justice-Oriented Professionalism: Lessons Learned From a Critical Service-Learning Project in a Professional Writing Course ↗Renea C. Frey; Jeffrey M. Gerding; Ethan Nichols; Danielle Stone
-
College Composition and Communication Sep 2024Understanding Writing Instructors’ Feelings toward the Affordances of Multimodal Social Advocacy Projects: Implications for Service-Learning Pedagogies ↗Jason Tham; Jialei Jiang
-
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Dec 2023