Expectation, Reality, and Rectification: The Merits of Failed Service Learning

Suzanne Kesler Rumsey Purdue University Fort Wayne ; Tanja Nihiser Purdue University Fort Wayne

Abstract

Prompted by Cushman’s and Grabill’s call to “ask and answer the difficult questions” about service learning (Reflections 2009), this article addresses the difficult question of “what happens when service learning goes wrong.” Authors engaged in family history writing and service learning with a local historical group. When the project was unable to be sustained, authors theorized a three-part methodological continuum of expectation, reality, and rectification to articulate the merits of failed attempts at service learning.

Journal
Community Literacy Journal
Published
2011-04-01
DOI
10.25148/clj.5.2.009416
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →