Abstract
In this analysis of the intelligent design theory textbook, Of Pandas and People, I seek a better understanding of how the authors propose intelligent design as a legitimate science. By looking at this text through the rhetorical concept of imitation, I show how the authors attempt to validate the text for uses in public education classrooms. In doing this, the authors of the text attempt to imitate science, scientists and science textbooks, but do so in ways that reveal their teleological position to the scientific and legal community and alienate their creationist progenitors.
- Journal
- Poroi
- Published
- 2012-04-02
- DOI
- 10.13008/2151-2957.1109
- Open Access
- OA PDF Bronze
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
CrossRef global citation count: 2
View in citation network →
Related Articles
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026Emily Kuzneski Johnson
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026Leslie Seawright; Amy Hodges; Timothy Ponce
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026“It's Hard to Show ROI When You’re Preventing Things from Happening”: How Impact Storytelling Frames Community Health Initiatives for Executive Audiences ↗Margaret Hsiao
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026All Are Connected: From Traditional Chinese Medicine to Students’ Literacy Practices Reviewing Doing Difference Differently: Chinese International Students’ Literacy Practices and Affordances by Zhaozhe Wang ↗Shi, Carina Jiaxing