Abstract

everal of the pieces in LiCS' inaugural issue warn against easy valorization of marginalized groups' community-based literate practices (Flannery; Horner; Parks; Trainor). Bruce Horner cautions that fetishizing these and digital literate practices re-instates the autonomous model of literacy critiqued by new literacy studies scholars. Such fetishization presumes that liberatory power inheres in these literacies. This fetishization fails to join marginalized groups in using literacy to transform inequitable social relations (Horner 5-6). Similarly, Kathryn Flannery affirms community-based literate practices but argues that compositionists must emphasize the value of academic literacies, as do Steve Parks and Jennifer Seibel Trainor.

Journal
Literacy in Composition Studies
Published
2014-03-15
DOI
10.21623/1.2.1.6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (8) · 6 in this index

  1. Brandt, Deborah. Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.
  2. Literacy in Composition Studies
  3. Literacy in Composition Studies
  4. Literacy in Composition Studies
  5. Literacy in Composition Studies
Show all 8 →
  1. Selfe, Cynthia L. and Gail E. Hawisher. Literate Lives in the Information Age: Narratives of Literacy from th…
  2. Literacy in Composition Studies
  3. Literacy in Composition Studies