Hierarchical Approach to Corporate Advocacy: Corporate Advocacy as a Way of Guilt Redemption

KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society 2008 web Open Access

Hierarchical Approach to Corporate Advocacy: Corporate Advocacy as a Way of Guilt Redemption

Abstract

AMONG THE RHETORICAL STRATEGIES COMPANIES UTILIZE for establishing and maintaining relationships with publics, corporate advocacy occupies a central place. An object of scholars’ attention for a long time, corporate advocacy is a fairly well-defined concept (Boyd, 2004; Heath, 1980; Hoover, 1997; Jacoby, 1974; Sethi, 1977). Corporate rhetoric existed as long as corporations themselves: examples of use and misuse of this rhetoric can be found as early as the 19th century (Boyd, 2001). Since the examination of origins of any phenomenon is often a key to successful understanding and usage of that phenomenon, studying the nature and origins of corporate advocacy is essential (Sethi, 1977; Schuetz, 1990; Hoover, 1997). It seems, however, that many scholars, although exploring the nature and origins of corporate advocacy in the past, have placed emphasis on exploring functions, purposes, and processes of corporate advocacy (Boyd, 2001, 2004). Researchers who examined corporate advocacy often tend to explain its nature through practical applications, such as advocacy advertising (Sethi, 1977; Cutler & Muehling, 1989; Starr & Waller, 1995).

Journal: KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society
Published: 2008
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Gold
Topics: rhetorical criticism
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Citation data not yet available for this article.

Citation data is not available for KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.