Abstract
This article discusses findings from semi-structured interviews with writing consultants about their affective experiences working across three different consulting modalities: in person, asynchronous, and synchronous. This study offers affect as a lens for understanding consultants’ responses to and strategies for consulting in multiple modalities and argues that by attending to affect, emotion, and disposition in consulting we can better support our consultants when they’re consulting in different modalities.
- Journal
- Writing Center Journal
- Published
- 2025
- DOI
- 10.7771/2832-9414.2042
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
The Peer Review Sep 2021Alex Claman; Alex Claman; Claire Seekins; Seanie Mardell
-
Writing Center Journal 2015Word Choice Errors in Chinese Students' English Writing and How Online Writing Center Tutors Respond to Them ↗Carol Severino; Shih-Ni Prim
-
The Peer Review Sep 2025Moving Against the Grain: Combining Writing Center Theory and In-House Editing Services to Create a Graduate Writing Center ↗Brian Harrell; Brook Wyers; Craig Theissen
-
Writing Center Journal 2025Beyond Convenience: A Mixed-Methods Study of Asynchronous Multimodal Tutoring and Its Impact on Understanding and Connection ↗Sohui Lee; Abigail Michelini
-
Writing Center Journal 2025Daniel Messier; Hadi Riad Banat