College Composition and Communication Feb 2026

Crying Censorship Wolf: Prefiguring Contemporary Realities through Disciplinary History

Holly Hassel ; Kate L. Pantelides

Abstract

US higher education faces mounting political pressure and censorship, resulting in threats to our institutional missions and challenges to academic freedom. In this article, we trace two moments in disciplinary history that examine (mis)understandings of how censorship functions: efforts to roll back the Guidelines for Nonsexist Use of Language in NCTE Publications (now Statement on Gender and Language ) and Students’ Right to Their Own Language , both approved by NCTE in the mid-1970s. We draw from the feminist theories of Kate Manne and bell hooks to analyze materials from the NCTE and CCCC archives, documenting the rhetorical and logistical moves employed in these rollback efforts. In doing so, we identify how the exploitation of organizational apparatuses contributed to the subversion of a larger and necessary priority: establishing credible disciplinary boundaries to serve as a bulwark against political encroachment into literacy education. In sorting through these case studies, we offer examination of how misguided censorship accusations can threaten our discipline when actual censorship efforts are enacted by governmental entities.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc2026773404
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism literacy studies gender and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (39) · 5 in this index

  1. (1982)
  2. Allen (1985)
  3. Allen (1983)
    Transmittal letter for the final report on the Committee on the Advisability of a Languag…
  4. Allen
  5. Allen (1979)
Show all 39 →
  1. 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure
  2. Applebee (1978)
  3. Barnard (2010)
    The Ruse of Clarity
    College Composition and Communication
  5. Students’ Right to Their Own Language (with bibliography). CCCC Position Statements
  6. Corbett (1975)
  7. Daniels (1983)
    Conference on Language Attitudes and Composition Newsletter
  8. (2022)
    Shawnee State University Pays $400k Following Sixth Circuit Ruling in Favor of Professor’…
  9. Graban (2022)
    Feminists (in) Dialogue: Mapping Convergent Moments and Telling Divergent Histories of th…
    Peitho
  10. Guidelines for the Nonsexist Use of Language
  11. Hassel (2023)
    Feminist Resistance, Resilience, and Concession: Historical Moments of Activism by NCTE a…
    Peitho
  12. Hill (1983)
  13. (2000)
    Feminism Is for Everybody
  14. Jacques Derrida
    Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A Peer-Reviewed Academic Resource
  15. Jamal (2023)
    The Discourse Is Toxic. Universities Can Help
    New York Times
  16. Lopez (2025)
    Attacks on Speech Betray a Bedrock Principle of Our Democracy
    PEN America
  17. Malenczyk (2018)
    Composition, Rhetoric, and Disciplinarity
     ↗
  18. Manne (2018)
    Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny
  19. Manne (2020)
    Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women
  20. McCaffrey (1975)
  21. Meehan (2023)
    Banned in the USA: The Mounting Pressure to Censor
    PEN America
  22. (2018)
    Statement on Gender and Language
  23. (2018)
    The Students’ Right to Read
  24. (1979)
  25. Parks (2000)
    Class Politics: The Movement for the Students’ Rights to Their Own Language
  26. Paulson (2023)
  27. Perryman-Clark (2014)
    Students’ Right to Their Own Language: A Critical Sourcebook
  28. Phelps et al. (2010)
    Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studie…
    College Composition and Communication
  29. Powers et al. (2007)
    “Anti-American Studies” in the Deep South:
    College Composition and Communication
  30. Priest (2025)
    Video of Clash over Gender-Identity Content in Texas A&M Children’s Lit Class Leads to Fi…
    The Texas Tribune
  31. Reed
  32. Schulz (1975)
    How Serious Is Sex Bias in Language?
    College Composition and Communication
  33. (2022)
    Senate of Tennessee
  34. Sledd (1984)
    James Sledd Responds
    College English
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Feb 2026
    Voices from Rock Bottom: Queering Addiction Recovery Rhetoric & Community Literacy ↗
    Danielle Bacibianco
    rhetorical criticism archival research multimodality literacy studies gender and writing public rhetoric community literacy
  2. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  4. Composition Forum Mar 2025
    A Data Feminist Pedagogy for Composing the Rhetorical Life of Statistics ↗
    rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy literacy studies gender and writing
  5. College Composition and Communication Feb 2025
    “Because We’re Going to Mess Up”: Practices for Accountability—Not a Piecemeal Approach ↗
    Beth Godbee; Rasha Diab
    rhetorical criticism literacy studies gender and writing