The Writing Center Paradox: Talk about Legitimacy and the Problem of Institutional Change
Abstract
Scholarship on writing centers often relies on validation systems that reconcile tensions between equality and plurality by privileging one over the other. According to feminist political theorist Chantal Mouffe, neither absolute equality nor absolute plurality are possible in any democratic system, a conflict she calls “the democratic paradox” and insists is the essence of a “well-functioning democracy” that supports pluralistic goals. The following article argues that a similar logic shapes writing center work and, therefore, any attempt to promote change must likewise embrace the democratic paradox as it manifests itself in the writing center: “the writing center paradox.”
- Journal
- College Composition and Communication
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/ccc20098316
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Pedagogy Apr 2025modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2025LGBTQ+ Alliances and Allies: Affinity Groups as Queered Professional Development for Writing Centers ↗Katharine Brown; Jonah Breed
-
The Peer Review Sep 2024Liz A. W. Thomae; Aleena A. Jacob
-
Pedagogy Jan 2024Molly Parsons
-
Pedagogy Jan 2024