Engaging Intellectual Work: The Faculty's Role in Assessment
Abstract
he call for improved educational assessment, and specifically the assessment of writing programs, has become louder and more urgent in the past decade. I want here to explore the place of faculty and faculty values in the process of assessing the work of higher education. How can we find better ways to put the intellectual work of faculty and students at the center of our educational concerns and, as a consequence, at the center of assessment models? A focus on first-year writing courses seems to me to be especially fruitful in responding to these questions. A university education is the work faculty and students do together, work pursued closely and undertaken carefully over time. This being the case, the first-year writing course (often the only course required of all students at a college or university) can clarify in crucial ways the primary place of intellectual work-of study and thought-in our understanding of the meaning and purposes of the university. Such a clarification can thereby help to resist the commodification of education and the corporatization of its institutions. As I have argued elsewhere,1 the first-year course should not be foundational to but rather be organic with the rest of the curriculum; it should not ground but enact the intellectual work of the university; it should not anticipate but begin the students' education. Language that conceptualizes the first-year course in terms of foundation, preparation, and anticipation narrativizes and scaffolds this course in order to empty it out: the meaning of the course is elsewhere. Its outcomes, not its work, give it its value.
- Journal
- College English
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- DOI
- 10.2307/378994
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (3)
-
Boedy (2017)Technical Communication Quarterly
-
Dryer (2013)Written Communication
-
Andrade (2007)Assessing Writing
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Sep 2025Academic research AND (Google OR Reddit): A librarian-faculty collaboration to improve student source engagement ↗Stephanie Redekop; Olivia Hobbs
-
Pedagogy Oct 2024rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter
-
Pedagogy Apr 2024modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
-
Pedagogy Apr 2024Zachary C. Beare; Jessica Masterson; Shari J. Stenberg
-
Double Helix Jan 2024Challenging Assessment Practices, and the Need for Multimodal Applications to Service Learning in First-Year Composition ↗Kimberly A. Bain