Earth discourses

Abstract

Defining global warming as a rhetorical construct built by stakeholders, this study investigates how Chinese state and social media understand risk and responsibility regarding climate change. This multi-layer, multi-dimensional, statistical and qualitative textual analysis focuses on the ratification and implementation of the Paris Agreement and the U.S. withdrawal from it. Findings indicate that a new green public sphere led by grassroots experts and aided by lay people is burgeoning in China and changing the way people conceptualize environmental risks and engage in environmental protection. With theoretical and methodological innovations, this study contributes to the emerging field of transnational environmental communication.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2019-05-10
DOI
10.1145/3331558.3331566
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. Burke K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. Burke K. (1966). L…
  2. Burke K. (1984). Attitudes toward history. Los Altos CA: Hermes Publication. Burke K. (1984). Attitudes towar…
  3. 10.1086/229213
  4. Haraway. D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham NC: Duke University Press…
  5. Hook G. Lester L. Ji M. Edney K. Pope C. & Does-Ishikawa L. (2017). Environmental pollution and the media: po…
  6. 10.1177/1748048514568765
  7. Murphy P. (2017). The media commons: Globalization and environmental discourses. Chicago IL: University of Il…
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →