Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay examines how the dialectic over the presence of rhetoric in Michel Foucault’s catalog of truth telling in ancient Greek and Roman texts informs a separate but similar dialectic over the relationship between parrhēsia and contemporary whistleblowing. I posit that the argumentation justifying the practice of government and military whistleblowing used by Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning parallels the dispute over rhetoric’s place in parrhēsia. This essay plots out how the arguments for or against the presence of rhetoric in parrhēsia routinely manifests at specific junctures in the whistleblowing timeline, indicating how the dialectic of parrhēsia naturally leads to a rhetoric of whistleblowing.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2016-09-01
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2016.1232206
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome
    The American Journal of Philology  
  2. Parrhesia: The Rhetoric of Free Speech in Early Modern England
    Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric  
  3. Rewarding Whistleblowers: A Conceptual Problem?
    International Journal of Applied Philosophy  
  4. The Courage of Truth (The Government of Self and Others II)
  5. The Hermeneutics of the Subject
  6. Levy, Carlos. “Politics to Philosophy to Theology: Some Remarks about Foucault’s Interpretation of…
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →