Greek “Figured Speech” on Imperial Rome

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Jul 2015

Greek “Figured Speech” on Imperial Rome

Laurent Pernot

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under the Roman Empire, the Greek elites expressed the greatest respect for the emperors and celebrated the advantages of Roman domination. But behind the brilliant façade, certain factors of complexity were at work. This article uses the notion of “figured speech” to detect covert advice or reservation in the works of Dio of Prusa, known as Dio Chrysostom, and Aelius Aristides, two important representatives of Greek literature and the so-called Second Sophistic (first to second century CE). By “figured speech” ancient rhetoricians meant the cases in which orators resorted to ruses to disguise their intentions, by using indirect language to get to the points they wanted to make. Our method consists of linking certain texts by Aristides and Dio and passages from theoretical treatises together to make clear the precise procedure of figured speech that is used in each case: eloquent silence, “the hidden key,” blame behind praise, generalization, and speaking through a mask. Figured speech is an avenue of research that is opening up to interpret Greek rhetoric and literature better. The Greek case is particularly rich, and it could help analyze the return of the same phenomenon in other epochs and other cultures.

Journal: Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published: 2015-07-03
DOI: 10.1080/15362426.2015.1081525
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Topics: rhetorical theory

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Geraths (2017)

Early Christian Rhetoric(s) <i>In Situ</i>

Advances in the History of Rhetoric

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓

Ahl (1984)

The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome

American Journal of Philology ↗
Bartsch (1994)

Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian

↗
Bowie (1970)

Greeks and Their Past in the Second Sophistic

Past and Present ↗
Breij (2006)

“Pseudo-Quintilian’s Major Declamations 18 and 19: Two controversiae figuratae

Rhetorica ↗
Montefusco, Lucia (2003)

Ductus and Color: The Right Way to Compose a Suitable Speech

Rhetorica ↗
Chiron (2003)

Les rapports entre persuasion et manipulation dans la théorie rhétorique du discours figuré.”

↗
Dominik (2009)

Writing Politics in Imperial Rome

↗
Heath (2003)

Pseudo-Dionysius ‘Art of Rhetoric’ 8–11: Figured Speech, Declamation, and Criticism

American Journal of Philology ↗
Hillgruber (2000)

Die Kunst der verstellten Rede. Ein vernachlässigtes Kapitel der antike Rhetorik

Philologus ↗
Jones (1978)

The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom

↗
Mason (2005)

Figured Speech and Irony in T. Flavius Josephus.”

↗
Montiglio (2000)

Silence in the Land of Logos

↗
Pernot (2008)

Aelius Aristides and Rome

↗
Pernot (2015)

Epideictic Rhetoric: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise

↗
Veyne (2005)

L’Empire gréco-romain

↗
Whitlark (2012)

‘Here We Do Not Have a City That Remains’: A Figured Critique of Roman Imperial Propagand…

Journal of Biblical Literature ↗
Wooten (2001)

The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →