Abstract

ABSTRACT As the popular narrative has it, the modern speech discipline in the United States was born out of a concern for democracy and reason. However, this story occludes other, decidedly undemocratic, foundational ideas that were at the heart of rhetoric and oratory during the first half of the twentieth century. Given contemporary concerns with both deliberative democracy and affect theory, rhetoricians and speech teachers would benefit today from a fuller understanding of some of the undemocratic ideas that influenced the modern rhetorical renaissance. This article helps accomplish this by focusing on the work of Gustave Le Bon, whose concern with persuasion and the masses was influential on early scholars of rhetorical oratory, including James Winans, William Brigance, and James O’Neill. Indeed, it was Gustave Le Bon who popularized the notion that the masses were like a psychological crowd devoid of reason and the ability to deliberate.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2014-01-02
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2014.886932
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Advances in the History of Rhetoric

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Citizen Audience: Crowds, Publics, and Individuals
  2. Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini’s Italy
  3. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego
  4. The Psychology of Peoples
  5. Places in Time: The Inns and Outhouses of Rhetoric
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →