Abstract

This study contributes to the literature on corporate diversity and crisis management by analyzing stakeholder perceptions in the aftermath of Google’s and Microsoft’s sexual harassment scandals. The results reveal that both scandals were construed from the perspective of activism, an inherent feature of social media communication. While users made demands for additional corrective action from both companies, Google’s scandal was predominantly defined from the frames of controllability and perceived injustice, possibly eroding corporate reputation. By contrast, the frame of severity prevailed in the online discourse around Microsoft and showed a delineation between perceptions of senior leadership and HR. The findings have implications for the practice of communication management with respect to scandals.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906241229178
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (132)

  1. How did the company respond to reviews on Twitter? Es teh indonesia’case
    Jurnal Studi Komunikasi
  2. Agence France Press. (2022 September 29). MeToo Movement: Five years on how a hashtag shook the world. NDTV W…
  3. 10.1002/csr.2079
  4. Anderson M. Toor S. (2018 October 11). How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since #MeToo w…
  5. 10.1007/s10551-014-2487-y
Show all 132 →
  1. An examination of factors affecting the success of underrepresented groups in the public …
    Public Relations Society of America Foundation
  2. Aydin R. Hartmans A. (2020 February 13). The rise and fall of Andy Rubin the former Google executive accused …
  3. 10.1177/2046147X211026854
  4. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564
  5. 10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
  6. 10.1515/9783110554236-004
  7. Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory extended
  8. 10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
  9. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. 10.18848/1447-9532/CGP/v08i04/39634
  11. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030184
  12. 10.1080/13678868.2022.2047252
  13. 10.1177/15344843211072356
  14. Canon G. (2018 October 25). Google gave top executive $90m payoff but kept sexual harassment claim quite-repo…
  15. 10.1177/19401612221106405
  16. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102226
  17. 10.1177/1077699019835896
  18. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003
  19. 10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498342
  20. 10.1177/21674795211067471
  21. 10.1177/0021943604265607
  22. 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.10.003
  23. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding
  24. 10.1515/9783110554236-005
  25. 10.4324/9781315749068-12
  26. 10.4324/9781351173001-41
  27. 10.1108/JCOM-08-2018-0078
  28. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102234
  29. 10.1080/1062726X.2023.2244615
  30. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102174
  31. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102003
  32. Dickey M. R. (2019 March 11). Google paid $105 millions to two executives accused of sexual harassment. https…
  33. Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the im…
    Public Relations Journal
  34. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012
  35. 10.2307/258557
  36. Fiegerman S. (2019 March 16). Microsoft fired about 20 employees for sexual harassment in one year. CNN. http…
  37. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102356
  38. Gershgorn D. (2019 April 4). Amid employee uproar Microsoft is investigating sexual harassment claims overloo…
  39. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000940
  40. 10.1002/pa.1450
  41. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.009
  42. Women in corporate communication: How gender influences practice
  43. Guzior B. (2018 November 8). Google promises change after staff walkout. Bizwomen. https://rb.gy/1fto2d
  44. Hellerstedt K. Uman T. Wennberg K. (2022). Fooled by diversity? When diversity initiatives exacerbate rather …
  45. 10.1177/13691481211015920
  46. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.030
  47. 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  48. Corporate communication as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory & practice
  49. Resistance from the margins: The postmodern public relations practitioner as organization…
    Journal of Corporate Communication Research
  50. 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.09.005
  51. 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1204_2
  52. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102202
  53. An appraisal of thematic analysis: Warts and all
    AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
  54. Hurst B. Johnston K. A. Lane A. B. (2023). A relational approach to social impact: Moving beyond instrumental…
  55. 10.3846/jbem.2022.16199
  56. 10.1177/0093650211423918
  57. 10.1108/13563281011085529
  58. 10.1080/1062726X.2012.676747
  59. Crisis communication in sport management: Research aides crisis response selection
    Kentucky Association of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance
  60. 10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096
  61. 10.1080/17517575.2021.1907863
  62. Image repair strategies in public relations crisis: A case study of Real Madrid’s respons…
    Revista Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice
  63. Social media in sport
  64. Krishna A. Kim S. Shim K. (2021). Unpacking the effects of alleged gender discrimination in the corporate wor…
  65. Lancia F. (2012). T-LAB pathways to thematic analysis. https://tinyurl.com/bdhyv6xc
  66. Lee D. (2018 November 1). Google staff walk out over women’s treatment. BBC. https://rb.gy/fooggj
  67. Levy N. (2019 April 15). Internal memo: Satya Nadella promises Microsoft HR overhaul following new sexual har…
  68. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102071
  69. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
  70. 10.1080/1062726X.2021.1881898
  71. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars
    AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
  72. Corporate diversity engagement strategy. An insight into American MNCs’ online communitie…
  73. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102058
  74. 10.1108/13632541211197996
  75. 10.1177/2046147X221081176
  76. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102261
  77. Diversity 2.0: How the public relations function can take the lead in a new generation of…
    Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations
  78. Bridging the divide: A multidisciplinary analysis of diversity research and the implicati…
    Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations
  79. Research anthology on managing crisis and risk communications
  80. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.006
  81. 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.17350abstract
  82. 10.1080/01463370209385663
  83. How to establish and protect power: Critical discourse analysis of NFL’s image repair on …
  84. Public relations graduates’ perceptions of their degrees and careers: A five-university study
    Public Relations Education
  85. 10.1080/1062726X.2012.626137
  86. Public relations’ role as diversity advocate: Avoiding microaggressions and nurturing mic…
    Public Relations Journal
  87. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.007
  88. Rim H. Lee Y. Yoo S. (2020). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network…
  89. 10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
  90. 10.1108/ICT-07-2020-0091
  91. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101584
  92. 10.1108/JBS-04-2019-0075
  93. Organizational culture and leadership
  94. 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.07.007
  95. Theorizing crisis communication
  96. Diversity in corporate communication
    Corporate Communication Journal
  97. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.005
  98. 10.4324/9781315173290
  99. Statistica. (2019a). Annual revenue for Google from 2002 to 2019 [dataset]. https://rb.gy/uuuoay
  100. Statistica. (2019b). Annual revenue for Microsoft from 2002 to 2019 [dataset]. https://rb.gy/xtbqto
  101. Su J. (2019 July 19). Confirmed: Google terminated project Dragonfly its censored Chinese search engine. Forb…
  102. 10.1177/14673584221103177
  103. The Guardian. (2018). Google walkout: Global protests after sexual misconduct allegations. https://rb.gy/gdy56n
  104. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.06.007
  105. 10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211010
  106. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102278
  107. Shifting the paradigm: Diversity communication on corporate web sites
    Public Relations Journal
  108. 10.1111/joms.12517
  109. 10.1177/1059601121997229
  110. Still a lily-white field of women: The state of workforce diversity in corporate communic…
    Corporate Communication Review
  111. 10.1080/15213269.2017.1378109
  112. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183
  113. Ward J. (2017 September 22). How fathering a son with disabilities helped Microsoft’s CEO transform the compa…
  114. 10.1080/03634523.2020.1811362
  115. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102005
  116. 10.1177/0306396805050019
  117. 10.1080/17544750.2018.1473265
  118. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014
  119. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101947
  120. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102274
  121. 10.1108/EDI-07-2019-0197
  122. Case study research and applications: Design and methods
  123. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102233
  124. 10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_17
  125. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102395
  126. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101944
  127. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102061