Abstract

This study contributes to the literature on corporate diversity and crisis management by analyzing stakeholder perceptions in the aftermath of Google’s and Microsoft’s sexual harassment scandals. The results reveal that both scandals were construed from the perspective of activism, an inherent feature of social media communication. While users made demands for additional corrective action from both companies, Google’s scandal was predominantly defined from the frames of controllability and perceived injustice, possibly eroding corporate reputation. By contrast, the frame of severity prevailed in the online discourse around Microsoft and showed a delineation between perceptions of senior leadership and HR. The findings have implications for the practice of communication management with respect to scandals.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906241229178
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 90 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1002/csr.2079
  2. 10.1007/s10551-014-2487-y
  3. 10.1177/2046147X211026854
  4. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564
  5. 10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
  6. 10.1515/9783110554236-004
  7. 10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
  8. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. 10.18848/1447-9532/CGP/v08i04/39634
  10. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030184
  11. 10.1080/13678868.2022.2047252
  12. 10.1177/15344843211072356
  13. 10.1177/19401612221106405
  14. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102226
  15. 10.1177/1077699019835896
  16. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003
  17. 10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498342
  18. 10.1177/21674795211067471
  19. 10.1177/0021943604265607
  20. 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.10.003
  21. 10.1515/9783110554236-005
  22. 10.4324/9781315749068-12
  23. 10.4324/9781351173001-41
  24. 10.1108/JCOM-08-2018-0078
  25. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102234
  26. 10.1080/1062726X.2023.2244615
  27. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102174
  28. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102003
  29. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012
  30. 10.2307/258557
  31. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102356
  32. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000940
  33. 10.1002/pa.1450
  34. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.009
  35. Hellerstedt K. Uman T. Wennberg K. (2022). Fooled by diversity? When diversity initiatives exacerbate rather …
  36. 10.1177/13691481211015920
  37. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.030
  38. 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  39. 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.09.005
  40. 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1204_2
  41. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102202
  42. Hurst B. Johnston K. A. Lane A. B. (2023). A relational approach to social impact: Moving beyond instrumental…
  43. 10.3846/jbem.2022.16199
  44. 10.1177/0093650211423918
  45. 10.1108/13563281011085529
  46. 10.1080/1062726X.2012.676747
  47. 10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096
  48. 10.1080/17517575.2021.1907863
  49. Krishna A. Kim S. Shim K. (2021). Unpacking the effects of alleged gender discrimination in the corporate wor…
  50. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102071
  51. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
  52. 10.1080/1062726X.2021.1881898
  53. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102058
  54. 10.1108/13632541211197996
  55. 10.1177/2046147X221081176
  56. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102261
  57. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.006
  58. 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.17350abstract
  59. 10.1080/01463370209385663
  60. 10.1080/1062726X.2012.626137
  61. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.007
  62. Rim H. Lee Y. Yoo S. (2020). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network…
  63. 10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
  64. 10.1108/ICT-07-2020-0091
  65. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101584
  66. 10.1108/JBS-04-2019-0075
  67. 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.07.007
  68. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.005
  69. 10.4324/9781315173290
  70. 10.1177/14673584221103177
  71. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.06.007
  72. 10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211010
  73. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102278
  74. 10.1111/joms.12517
  75. 10.1177/1059601121997229
  76. 10.1080/15213269.2017.1378109
  77. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183
  78. 10.1080/03634523.2020.1811362
  79. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102005
  80. 10.1177/0306396805050019
  81. 10.1080/17544750.2018.1473265
  82. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014
  83. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101947
  84. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102274
  85. 10.1108/EDI-07-2019-0197
  86. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102233
  87. 10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_17
  88. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102395
  89. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101944
  90. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102061
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →